>first listen: wow the production on this is great and the

Literally the definition of a 7/10 album

>>68190250
Id say a high 6 but maybe a 7 on a good day.
There are some good tracks on here but the weak chord progressions really hold this one back. Especially considering how great of a songwriter Angel Olsen has proven herself to be in the past.

>>68190239
She's a woman, so people will be more lenient regardless of how good her music is.

>>68190271
>>68190267
I'd give her a strong 6.9 if you know I am trying to convey

>>68190291
;)

>>68190239
>holy fuck why is it only these stupid ass back and forth chord progressions in every fucking song?

This is the first thing I noticed when I learned what a forth is. they are fucking everywhere

>>68190315
what's a forth and why is it considered a bad thing?

>>68190333
I imagine he meant a fourth
I'm too stupid to think of how to phrase it so just read the wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_fourth

>shut up kiss me oh retard
how rude

>>68190333
It's not a bad thing. OP was just complaining that they are overused which might be boring.

Its one of the most common interval jumps in music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQH8yLGualk

Her attempt to crossover into the mainstream with this album is laughably transparent. "Going for it" records are always cringe-y. You can tell her mgmt team is trying to appeal to dumb optimist YAS QUEEN women, so I've lost all respect for her.

>>68190857
I thought that was the actual lyric for a while.

DUDE YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A WOMAN LMAO

Yikes
i
k
e
s

>>68192140
Yes, that is a particularly awful lyric. It's a functionally meaningless statement, but so many dumb women will uncritically eat it up like candy.

This album was such a huge step back for her. :(

What went wrong?