The music is pretty good. The presentation, down from the album

>>68163980
This is correct

>wow 666 upside down cross xddd

G A R B A G E
A
R
B
A
G
E

>>68163992
I kinda don't understand how the label didn't get this and just refuse to put it out until he unretarded all that mess up.

Someone should have insisted to him at some point what a bad idea all that was.

I think it fits very well. The cover is spattered with symbols and the titles seem like computer gibberish yet it's aesthetically pleasing. The music is essentially just that translated to sound. Lots of gritty, overly processed layersthat still manage to be beautiful.

>>68164261
>yet it's aesthetically pleasing.

Not really, it's really shitty looking.

>>68164516
Agreed. It's polished but it's still a turd.

>>68164086
Because he's the most famous artist on his label.

>>68164516
I guess we like different things.

>>68164673
Keep em separate and you keep your name.

>>68164606
*true* but still, damn.

y'all are complaining too much about the album cover lol Jesus Christ that's a small part of the album as a whole

>>68164721
>This doesn't affect the quality of the music at the end of the day though.

>>68163980
It's true. I'm tempted to just change the track names to numbers. The album would be more enjoyable.

I like the track names and cover. I think they look cool. That's all.

Aesthetic

>>68164853
So this is the "dude, aesthetic, lmao" album then

>>68164731
I'm not talking my about OP lol

anyone got a link

>>68164709
>Keep em separate and you keep your name.
WDHMBT?