What is the lenght MU prefer to read on of album review? Short

>>68163623
Depends on if I'm actually interested in what they have to say

File: 551939f3c3a8c_piero_scaruffi.jpg (7KB, 200x195px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 200x195px

scaruffi-style

>>68164077
Oh shut up!

I haven't read an album review by anyone in ages.

>>68165110
I am sure you're speacial snowflake darling

I like them short and concise. Sometimes p4k reviews are really well-written and thought-provoking but that is rare. Most of the time it seems like they are bullshitting and trying too hard / grasping at straws. Their write-ups for albums on their end-of-year lists are usually better than the actual reviews. I've noticed that the New Yorker is pretty good at writing about albums, but they only write about one album every few weeks.

But honestly I feel like the Fantano method is the best. For some reason I feel like writing about music always comes across as pretentious, as people are always trying to one-up each other about how smart they sound, how "ahead of the curve" they are. With people just talking/vlogging/broadcasting about albums it gives it a way more organic feel. Just giving their honest opinion.

I'm pretty drunk right now so I hope this makes sense lol

>>68165156
Wow really nice feeback. I am also a music blogger but i am tryng to decide the best way to write for readers.

>>68165240
just be yourself, give your honest opinion, don't worry about what anyone else is saying.

>>68165371
Yeah that is true, I don't have deep vocabulary like pitchfork but i have deep love for music.

What would be your ideal music blog that you would go to everyday?

Doible kek

>>68163623
who da fucks read 4chan anyway?

>>68166108
wat?

>>68164077
unironically this. even tho he sometimes makes spelling mistakes

>>68163623
wat about consequences of sound? I think that is a shit ass place

>>68166795
everywhere is shit

Pitchfork is hit and miss, there some that are real shit. Reading a thesis would be less boring than those