Is post-grunge objectively the worst genre of mainstream

>>68156800
Politically conscious hip hop takes all of the top 10 places actually

I'd say post-britpop is up there

>>68156800
Yes, actually. Aesthetically and musically

>>68156881
But Travis, Coldplay and Doves are good

>>68156800
Musically yeah, but also its the genre equivalent of the obnoxious pseudo-tough guy you knew growing up who wears exclusively Buckle brands as an adult, never left your town, who beats his wife, and whose main export is racist facebook statuses that nobody reads.

File: Screenshot_2016-09-30-23-10-42.png (1MB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x1280px

Nickelbacj is unironically good, has a well rounded sound with great mixing, and all the music parts fit perfectly.

Prove me wrong.

>hurr durr mainstream
Not an argument.

nah, its just kind of there and never actually offensive or anything

>>68156800
do Third Eye Blind and Fuel count as post-grunge? because they both have some great songs

>>68157413
I unironically like Rockstar. I hate the rest of their music though.

File: Untitled.png (3MB, 1890x832px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1890x832px

>>68157399
>didn't know off the top of my head what buckle was
>look it up
>see this shit

you're pretty spot on

File: Cj9Q6D1UYAAaFGe.jpg (19KB, 570x479px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 570x479px

>>68156800
You say that when snap, electeo-swing, nu-metal, and crunkcore all exist.

>>68157413
Nickelback isn't good. They aren't terrible, but they didnt really contribute anything to music, they just recycled the same safe, radio friendly conventions that were already being used by other bands.

>>68157512
this