Has anyone addressed the bad CGI yet? A tweet? Anything?
It can't be this bad in the film, it needs to be brought to attention
>>30425334
>>30425334
This honestly need to be shoved into Hasbro and DHX face RIGHT NOW, so they can fix it.
It's a trailer for a movie that's not even finished yet
>>30425355
Then there would be no harm in asking.
>>30425389
This
>>30425334
Worst CGI I've seen is the zeppelin. But the still images of the CGI look good. And the zeppelin I understand is done in the same tone as the rest of background.
>>30425639
OP's picture is pretty close. The cannon would look much worse if it weren't static.
>>30425664
There's a difference between animation and models you tard
>>30425342
Isn't EqD on this or anything? It's not even a case of nitpicking, it's a case of wanting to do the movie right.
This poorly modelled CGI just can't be a thing
>>30425664
Those tweets were talking about a teaser a while back, not this trailer.
Oh look, it's this thread
AGAIN
>>30425334
Probably unpopular opinion but I don't think it's bad enough to call for a change.
>>30425968
Just like Archer.
>>30425334
3d and toon boon was a mistake. Just fucking do it in 2d or don't. This meme about 2,5D doesn't work. It always look like the moving objects are out of place with the backgrounds.
>>30425984
This screencap at OP look like taken out of a facebook vidya game about the movie. This is the 3d quality of gameloft games
>>30425334
Dammit i feel like the first trailers of Mass Effect Andromeda again. At least there are no jarring animation errors.
>>30425984
The Zeppelin here >>30425664 is a bigger offender than the OP. You can't look at that and think it's fine surely. This is a movie
What's funny is that we've had CGI in MLP before and it's looked far better (pic related). I'm just worried because I care.
>>30426057
It looks fine to me. What do you want it to look like?
>>30426022
Amazing World of Gumball makes it work, but that's more of an exception.
>>30426071
I hope you're baiting. It looks like a low poly model out of a PS2 game. It doesn't fit with the rest of the style either.
Just look at the beauty of Cantetlot contrasted with the terrible CGI model
CGI has come leaps and bounds, yet that model could pass as being made in 2001, or even made in SFM.
>>30425957
Here's a re-arrangement.
>>30425984
Besides the zeppelin, I think most of it could work, especially with the improved animation shading we can see in the German trailer. But I would like it if they did more work on the CGI before the final release.
>>30426106
Fair point, it does look more primitive than current technology would allow. But I never really expected particularly high quality from this kids movie. The animation is enormously better than I thought it would be already.
If I was in charge I'd have just made the zeppelin 2D.
>>30426194
That doesn't change anything
>>30427009
Of course it does, it's showing that the damage control tweet is for the teaser rather than the trailer, and that there is still reason to have caution for the animation, while having absolutely 0 expectations-if not conditioning to hate regardless of quality-for the writing.
>>30427044
I'm pretty sure Rebecca's not the one who handles Rendering the CGI though.
Pretty sure she animates the pones and that's it
CGI is usually finished near the end of production because you don't want to work too much on something that might get scrapped and is such an ancillary thing to the actual animation
>>30426071
>Needing this spelled out
Holy shit how
>>30425664
But why
I see nothing wrong with the CG besides the obvious placeholder airship and this ugly Canterlot building on the left.
>>30431075
That is the least stoned I've ever seen Treehugger look.
They probably weren't done rendering the scene but the marketing department threw a tantrum, so they had to fork over the WIP scenes for them to jumble together.
>>30425956
>Isn't EqD on this or anything?
Uh, yeah. https://www.equestriadaily.com/2017/06/everything-you-missed-in-mlp-movie.html#more
Borg starts ripping into that as soon as he gets to the scene of the airship flying in.
>>30425334
Reminds me a bit of Reboot
>>30431075
Canterlot looks lovely, what are you talking about?
>>30426037
And just like with Andromeda, drones will defend it against all reason.
Once again. CGI is saved for last, airship is 100% sure a placeholder. It doesn't even have boomtoons shading.
>>30425334
Well, no one adressed the deviantart-tier of character redesigns for the movie, so i guess bronies will eat-up anything hasbro shits on their mounths as long it has ponies in it.
>>30431075
What's up with the cardboard tree behind Treehugger?
I could make better models using the basic creation tools in fucking second life
So lets say this is a placeholder airship right.
Why would they promote their film with that scene instead of any other? why use that ugly unfinished bit?
>>30425354
>Movie comes out in 3 or so months
>He seriously believes they can still fix it
>>30432484
If you look at stage behind bear and prop tree it's obvious it's open stage theatre of some sort...
>>30432518
I see you know nothing about CGI
>>30432587
Do you even know how useless and inept animators are? Hasbro pays the worst of the worst, so they get what they pay for.
If you people have so many expectations about a movie made from people found in the discount bin, you are seriously lost.
>>30425334
The cgi in this pic is perfect. How the fuck else would they bring mlp style into 3D? that canon looks great and so do the buildings.
>>30433325
Not sure if trolling or legitimately retarded.
The cannon is rendered in 3D, and it looks a decade out of date. The buildings are 2D and look fine.
>>30432603
>pick up brand new animating platform
>recreate every single asset in the entire show from the ground up
>thinking they would finish this quickly
>>30433712
>thinking they would finish this quickly
You just proved why the animation and assets will be half assed and fucking badly made, because they did them way too fast.
I would keep my hopes low, because of this exact reason.
>>30433748
doesnt sound like you would or else this conversation wouldnt be happening.
>>30433755
Why do you come here? to discuss pointless shit to pass time or why? you tell me, faggot.
>>30433777
>Why do you come here?
because i watch the show and movies.
>>30433788
>Implying I don't
Not right now you don't, idort
>>30432603
CGI is generally the very last thing finished in even feature films. Trailers for The Hobbit had scenes that looked flat out ugly in the trailers that were fixed on release. This is actually normal in movies.
>>30433999
Well then, hope you are right, but I don't have any kind of expectations.
Like I said, the people making the show and animating it are discount bin tier.
>>30434044
Then why are you spamming your fucking opinion everywhere like it was some universal truth or some shit
No one cares if you find it ugly and don't expect shit, it's not a reason to try and stop people from looking forward to it
Just stop
>>30434060
Because I feel like
This is public board and if I don't break any fucking rules you can't do shit about it
Just like I have to stand the shit from glim posters and nyxfags
We are together in this hell, faggot.
>>30434074
>i'm being a piece of shit because half the board are /b/tards and /v/irgins xD
it's like you don't even watch the fucking show
>>30434090
You would love if I didn't watch it to ban me, huh?
>>30434074
>thinking a ban should be what makes you behave like an adult
fucking underage faggot. you shouldnt need extra persuasion to not be an insufferable nigger.
>>30434127
I am bored so I just post to pass time.
>>30434140
>im bored so i shitpost xD
>no one can stop me!
really, fuck off underage b&.
>>30434162
Calling me underage won't make it true.
In fact a kid would have said "like this board was for grown ups XD" like you want me to, so I get banned.
But I am 20, so you will never get me.
Cry harder, anon.
>>30434180
being underage has nothing to do with your number. it has to do with your level of maturity, you underage faggot.
>>30434192
More tears please.