So are they going to do anything to make sure Treehouse doesn't

>>29989907
Because OP is a pussy bitch that is a """goodboy""" that doesn't like "leaks"

are you refusing to watch the episodes because they air early? are you stupid?

>>29989907
That's not the point; they're going to go through the entire first half of the season (or even more so) in practically a month by showing two in a week.

>>29989906
Who's they? Hasbro? Discovery? The mods?

>>29989926
and?

>>29989980
OP wants Hasbro to moderate how channels air the show.

>>29989906
They could air everything up to the finale and I'd still enjoy it. BLESS CANADA

>>29989915
>>29989926
Regardless of how fast we get the episodes, we'll have to wait the same amount of time for the new season to start. It's better to space out episodes so we'll have less time without new pony content and more time to discuss each episode instead of discarding one episode the day after it airs to discuss another.

Is that really not something that crossed your mind?

>>29990428
This. This is why Treehouse needs to change their schedule as soon as next week.

File: 1482214528545.png (334KB, 1045x899px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 1045x899px

>>29989906
>>29990496
The problem is it's _not_ going to ruin S7.
It's certainly not going to bother the children watching Saturday Morning cartoons.

Hell, it's not even going to ruin _the show_ for any of us. We're still going to watch the damned thing however we can.

What it will do is plunge this board, plus whatever other fandom sites or chatrooms anons lurk into an early and extended hiatus.

Hasbro doesn't care about you: networks don't track 20-somethings watching MLP because they can't sell ad space to that. They only rarely glean a few clammy dollars from your spaghetti-smeared palms if you buy an actual pony to brush its mane or an official (probably 4DE) plush.

So yeah, unless we organize a weekly re-watch or something after treehouse blows its load, it's gonna be a rough hiatus before s8.

>>29989906
Eh, there wasn't really too much discussion or spoilers today.

Mod-nigger is going to have a weekend long rolling sticky for both ebisodes
>>29988293

>>29989906
Nope. There's no restriction on them playing the episodes they have in any amount they wish.

If they'd wanted, they could literally spoil half of S7 in a single week. As it is, the season's duration is halved compared to what we expected as a result, with most non-hardcore fans getting things at the usual rate.

Of course, that doesn't include /mlp/. It's like S3, only with a full season's worth of content instead of an abridged version.

>>29990580
>What it will do is plunge this board, plus whatever other fandom sites or chatrooms anons lurk into an early and extended hiatus.

That sounds pretty season ruining. As much as some writefags will argue otherwise, this board is for discussion of the show and pacing plays a large part in that.

File: chief executive lels.jpg (80KB, 650x490px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 650x490px

>hasjew exec's rn

>>29990642
In that case we're just better off ditching Discovery altogether and watching Treehouse streams. Else we'll have one sticky with half of anons commenting on the two new episodes, and half commenting on the one the other already saw 2-3 weeks ago.

>>29990580
I think Treehouse's fast airings will stop after the season's first half. The episodes ater that simply aren't finished yet so they can't air them. Mini hiatus from June to September.

>>29992153
Mini hiatuses ruin the board even more, so great for me.

>>29992153
>The episodes ater that simply aren't finished yet so they can't air them.
Proof?

File: Season 7 production.png (146KB, 599x964px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 599x964px

>>29993284
Happened a week ago but still true obviously

1/2

File: Season 7 production 2.jpg (401KB, 616x1548px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 616x1548px

>>29993284
>>29993852
2/2

>>29993874
>that autism
goddamn it

File: 1466410550672.png (156KB, 800x522px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 800x522px

>>29989906
leafs ruining everything yet again

>>29989906
Why does your image look so unsettling?