>ponyfags are not just furries Is this true at all? Seems

File: 1463100013944.png (153KB, 373x476px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 373x476px

>>29782150
Does fapping to the porn make you an actual furry? I thought you needed to actually participate in their fandom by going to conventions, using fursuits, and having a fursona. Not to mention their whole shtick is anthropomorphization. Most people here dislike that shit.

>>29782150
There are people that are only in it for the cute and the show, but they're not found here. They go to forums, EQD, YouTube, and other places.

>>29782166
This

>>29782166
Aren't brony conventions something like that as well? Fandoms do overlap a bit.
>anthropomorphization
MLP has its share of anthro art but I see your point. It's more on the levels of zoophilia then?

>>29782150
Easily. As much attention as the porn gets, the fact remains that it is just a small fraction of all the content the fandom creates. Just picture wise alone, safe images outnumber NSFW by nearly x8.

Being here on 4chan, of course, you're naturally more likely to see the lewder parts of the community, but outside this circlejerk, there's very little focus on the smut.

>>29782205
>zoophilia
More like xenophilia. Ponies are fully sapient and pretty much humanlike in nature (much to the dismay of their original creator).

File: 1488671389323.png (54KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1000x750px

>>29782207
It's only natural that SFW works would be more mainstream overall. But I wonder if you can continuously contribute to the community without ever getting into porn? At least with writing and drawing. Are there artists who sustain themselves on SFW only?

>>29782150
Yeah, you can watch the show and not fap to tha pones.

I don't.

File: 1490153195305.jpg (342KB, 1189x709px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 1189x709px

This guy got shit on for refusing to draw a vagina. Explain this, horsefuckers.
Featureless crotch is hotter anyway

>>29782244
How do you resist the temptation? Even without explicit images there's enought lewd stuff here.

>>29782150

Technically me. I have pictures of either cute ponies doing cute or cool things; and humanized or anthro stuff of sexual stuff. I have maybe a couple of pony lewds, but they're very humanistic.

Though I imagine if they were real, I would be xenophilic enough to date and have sex with one.

I mean, shit, I wrote pony erotica at some point.

>>29782226
>Zoophilia is a paraphilia involving a sexual fixation on non-human animals.
It is zoophilia, you silly, even if you don't fap to real ponies.

>>29782589
To be fair if they were real I don't think anyone would outright refuse a relationship with a pony because as >>29782226 said they are very human-like in everything other than appearance.

>>29782150
>Are there actually people here that are here only for the show and cute ponies?
There are a few, including me.

>>29783108
There's a difference between giving an animal human intellect and behaviour and making a human-animal hybrid.

>all about horse pussy (doesn't even matter who it belongs to)

Are you fucking implying that we are not forever loyal to our waifu horses and their pussies? Fuck off back to /pol/

>>29783457
Do you only fap to your waifu and no other ponies? In that case I'm proud of you

File: 1483248691105.png (160KB, 1020x1024px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1020x1024px

>>29782244
>>29782852
That's nice to hear.

File: happy_fluttershy_by_m99moron-d4rph4f.png (190KB, 900x1086px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 900x1086px

>>29782570
Self control.

I only see these characters as cute friendly animals.

>>29782150
It's true

File: 1489900101901.gif (900KB, 325x264px) Image search: [Google]

900KB, 325x264px

>>29784097
Funny because as more modern things are being introduced to the show with each season they act less and less horsy.

File: Bildschirmfoto vom 2017-04-02 23:11:19.png (2KB, 167x15px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 167x15px

>>29782150
what

People become bronies for multiple reasons anon. One of the main reasons being that they just enjoy the show for what it is and all the great content the fandom created around it during its inception. People also enjoy the escapism aspect that comes from a show about cutesy likable pones with rich personalities. Only a portion of bronies are into it for sexual

Most of the ones who go on /mlp/ are furries though

>>29782150
im literally onlu in for the show, characters, porn and memes

furrsonas and shit like that is the result of the peter pan syndrome in little kiddies who wanted to be a wolf as a kid

which i dont have anything encommon with

>>29782299
>draw something extremely lewd
>refuse to put on a vagina
I can see why people dislike this attitude. You clearly have no issue with making saucy pictures, but adding horsepussy is too far? Give me a break.

>>29782166
Yeah, I was always under the impression that you had to actively participate in the fandom to be considered a furry. Wouldn't just fapping to it and ignoring/having no interest in the rest be just like any other fetish?

>>29785505
It comes off as prudish but I can kinda see the point. Does it matter that much that you can't enjoy a picture if it has no genitals? Does the picture itself have so little value that people openly berate the artist for not complying?

File: IMG_5564.jpg (28KB, 425x354px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 425x354px

>>29782150
I've been on the ride for 6 years and I've never fapped to them. Ponies are too cute and adorable for me to find them sexy. Of course, there are artists who are really good at making them look like human women (giving them human body parts, human curves, etc). Pornography in general is degenerate, it leads to depression and sexual dysfunction, and I avoid it all costs.

>>29782237
> Are there artists who sustain themselves on SFW only?

I would say the majority of artists don't do porn, but I don't have any data to back that up.

>>29785557
Holy shit fuck people like this. People who cry and bitch and moan for an artist to gibs me da poosi the way that a baby cries for its mother's milk. Like the people in the Anon's Pie Adventures thread pestering pencils.

>lewd edit when? lewd edit when? lewd edit when?

Just use your fucking imagination.

>>29785557
It doesn't really matter to me personally, I think that's a great image. I was just playing Devil's advocate as I can see where people like that could be coming from.

>>29786534
I guess I can see that. It also may be that aritst's reasons are something like porn is beneath him or it devalues his art or something like that. I can also see him doing it on principle after this kind of feedback. I don't know the whole story behind it so I can't really judge. Personally I can appreciate twibutt on its own and featureless doesn't bug me at all.
I remember seeing some edits of the show with added genitals, so I can't say I'm surprised that a really nice lewd picture like that is getting this kind of reaction. People are willing to go any length for horsepussy.

>>29786596
If the artist thinks porn is beneath them I'd be surprised that they still drew things that lewd. That's effectively softcore porn. I wouldn't personally say it devalues an artist either, but I guess they could see it that way. I doubt it's out of principle but I can definitely see it happening.
Good featureless images are top unf though, you have good taste. It allows for much better lewds since you're not putting the focus on the genitalia, it has to be all beauty/pose/clothing.

>>29782150
No. Eventually you give in. I lasted about a year befor the porn infected me.

>>29786636
I like featureless for the same reason. I don't think that vag distracts from the rest of the image, but I guess it can be seen as a focus of the work and a chance to kinda go easy on drawing the rest of the image. Though I'm not an artist myself (yet) so I can't really say.
Even without delving into actual porn there's so much arousing and lewd content to go around I can't see a problem with one image staying SFW. Softcore can sometimes be a lot hotter than explicit porn. Same reason gravure idols became so popular in Japan.

File: 1232435435.png (142KB, 808x989px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 808x989px

>>29782150
>Do you think it's possible to partake in this fandom and not fap to ponies?

I've been in this fandom since 2011 and I haven't fapped to ponies at all. I'm just not sexually attracted to horses.

I know that makes me a faggot, but it's true.

>>29785762
Pencils isn't the one that does the lewd edits, though.

File: dog_days_by_csimadmax-d65bdlp.png (597KB, 713x2000px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 713x2000px

I think the biggest difference between furries and bronies is that one is a fandom dedicated to a specific show and the other is a more generalized group that likes/enjoys/appreciates anthropomorphic creatures.

That being said, there is a lot of intersectionality because the MLP characters are anthropomorphic themselves. But, just because someone likes the characters in MLP does not mean they like anthropomorphic characters from other media, especially "furry" ones.

>>29786822
Some furries even hate bronies, I don't know what's this about. Do they consider MLP as an entry-level gateway into furry fandom?

>>29782150
not a furry, yiffer, or fapper. I like it for reasons. I also prefer /mlp/ because is comfy and has a good sense of humor.

>>29783108
I don't understand this t b h.
Is "furryness" tied to how anthropomorphic something is? Does that mean EqGfags are the biggest furfags?

But in all honesty it's a separate subculture. It's treated as such here and elsewhere. I can easily go about my day without stepping foot on furry places or interacting with their fandom. Is there overlap? Sure. But there's also overlap with weebs too.

>>29786740
Faggot.

I've been on both sides of the line. Been a furry since I was 12 (I am not mentally well), and got into the porn side of the fandom in 2011. Was a clopper for like 6 months, then stopped. Still not sure why, it just didn't appeal to me anymore. Even wrote a little bit. I got into it "ironically", making jokes about it etc, then it started to get me hardI'm 28. I was a hardcore clopper for a while, then something about my mindset changed and I wasn't into it anymore. Difficult to pin down the reason, but I think it was to do with how much I enjoy the show, and how it kept and keeps me going during a longstanding battle with depression. I'm still pretty fucked up mentally and sexually, but at least I can say I don't fap to kiddies cartoons anymore. Been wanting to see a psychiatrist, but I'm too poor :(

>>29787752
Don't know how I fucked up the age spoiler, testing

>>29786740
kys my man. Surrender to the horsepuss.

File: 1252889__safe_rarity_applejack_shipping_lesbian_crossover_commission_weapon_rarijack_axe.jpg (102KB, 719x1111px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 719x1111px

>>29785679
please stay pure anon, as someone who fell for the porn meme I'm telling you, never do it. Not even once!

File: zWI8t9y.gif (2MB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 853x480px

>>29784097
man honestly i wish i were in your shoes

i don't even remember how i got into lewd pone, now i feel like such an innocent and cute show shouldn't be desecrated, but idk if i can stop the clop

>>29782299
who's the artist? google images ain't giving me shit

>>29788539
It's ncmares, but he goes under the name of "raps" on tumblr.

File: mlfw11072_medium.jpg (32KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x640px

>>29787423
>good sense of humor

you've got some good humor, too, anon

>>29788558
ah i know him, didn't recognize his art style, he makes good horsey drawings

>>29782299
Good for him for refusing. It's good to know someone won't sell his soul for a buck.

>>29782150
I like the porn a lot, both as something sexually attractive and as an exploration of the characters, but without the story and setting behind it, it'd mean a lot less. I certainly wouldn't care after I finished getting off to it. To be completely honest, where MLP is concerned I can be into anthro, humanized, EQG, show-accurate, or a number of things in between. The type of portrayal doesn't matter nearly as much as what it's portraying.

Regardless, I've never had a sexual interest in the show itself. That's reserved for fan material.

>>29788748
>I've never had a sexual interest in the show itself. That's reserved for fan material.
Wait, does that imply that there are people who fap to the show itself? Like just to screencaps of characters or something?

>>29782618
Is fapping to aliens zoophilia then?

>>29789709
Depends on what kind of aliens. Is it sexy pony aliens?

>>29790662
It could be. It's the same situation either way

>>29790711
But in case with ponies for some people it's not the "horse" part of it that makes them attractive, it's the character. So if you want to fuck a cartoon pony but real horses or any other animals don't seem attractive is it still just zoophilia? Because that seems like it's not the case.

>>29789388
I've seen a few threads where people mentioned doing that. Mostly sounds strange to me, but there is that one scene in Rarity Investigates. Can't blame them for finding that attractive.

>>29782150
Personally I don't see it as furry. I don't fap to this but perhaps at some point I will, but in my mind I see these characters more as little girls than horses to be honest.
Make of that what you will.

>>29782150
I have never been nor ever will identify as a furry. I certainly identify as a ponyfag tho.

>>29782150
I'm not here for the porn, I just like silly cute ponies. I don't identify as a pony or anything either. For me, ponies are just a break from the three ring shitshow that is my life.

>>29782237
All the 'big names' ends up drawing porn.
Even if they start out as 'no way I'm drawing pony porn ever'.
Either they stop drawing ponies, or they start drawing horsecocks.
And it's normal and perfectly logical.
Artists are people, people can get horny.
1+1=2

>>29785557
>draws something saucy
>pretends it's not for people to masturbate too
Yeah sure, whatever anon.

Only reasons people don't draw genitals (on cheesecake) is because they can't and/or don't feel like learning how to.
No need to make any redditor mental gymnastics.

File: full.png (77KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 250x250px

I do believe there is intersectionality between the furry and the nor/mlp/eople just because of how we behave, but there is one key difference that separates us from furries: We center our passion around the show. They center their passion around the community. We both have giant fan communities, we both make tons of art, we both make tons of music, etc... but the main kicker is what we do it for.

>Pony Fanbase
We have a community made to express our enthusiasm of the TV Show

>Furry Fanbase
They have a community made to express their enthusiasm of the community itself.

For this reason, I tend to consider anons who don't watch the show, who are only in it for the fanbase, "fans of the fandom" if you will. I consider those people essentially having the same mindset as a furry, although not exactly being one. The furry fanbase does not have a central TV Show they revolve around, no one single thing.

We formed a community around a show, they formed a community for the sake of the community. That's why I consider us different.

File: huzzah.png (239KB, 427x532px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 427x532px

>>29791168
Have you ever seen NCMares? That dude is one of the most talented artists who does only suggestive stuff at times, and he hates the idea when people sexualize his art. He almost quit drawing his suggestive content when one anon made an explicit edit. He came back when he realized the anon did it just to fuck with him.

The point is that there are definitely artists out there who like to draw suggestive things in a non-sexual manner. The idea that the every suggestive artist who doesn't draw genitals is because
>they can't and/or don't feel like learning how to
is just not correct.

File: 1490363339190.jpg (258KB, 900x813px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 900x813px

>>29782226
Yeah, it's definitely xenophilia, in the same way that people are attracted to the aliens in Mass Effect. Wanting to fuck a sapient species that has features which are sexually appealing to you shouldn't be weird. After all, a substantial number of people think Africans are attractive, and yet those people don't get called "monkey fuckers".

File: to_the_safehouse_by_ncmares-d972hef.jpg (873KB, 2000x1155px) Image search: [Google]

873KB, 2000x1155px

>>29791207
Because pic related ISN'T meant to be saucy or even 'suggestive', dimwit.

But yeah, you're right. There's a third reason.
Lazyness.

File: tumblr_omunw5niPe1v6x5j6o1_1280.png (674KB, 1280x763px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 1280x763px

>>29791234
>not posting his suggestive content
But yes anon, I'm obviously the dimwit. This is the picture that the edit was made in, and if you still don't believe he does suggestive content, this is an excerpt from his bio.

>Yes, this is still NC. Here is where I heed the call of booty under the alias 'Raps' so the fellows that don't wanna see suggestive stuff from me don't really have to. Some folks call it 'tasteful lood,' but I dunno. Either way, it isn't explicit which is just the way I like it. Edits were a no-go and I'd really appreciate if none were made. There is enough hardcore stuff without me contributing.
>suggestive stuff from me
>suggestive

And as for "laziness", I'm sure there are anons who are too lazy, incompetent, or whatever to make the explicit bits. However, you can't say that every artist who draws suggestive content wants it to be sexualized.

>>29791282
someone link the explicit edit, derpibooru is a nanny state that caters to every artists' wishes

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-03 at 2.15.00 PM.png (123KB, 1028x672px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1028x672px

>>29791319
It was a shit-tier edit, not even save-worthy. Also, I don't have a link to it after derpi killed it. But if you want to see NCMares' reaction to it:

https://raps-draws-bootayy.tumblr.com/
>pic related as well

>>29791282
Well, he's an hypocrite then?
I dunno anon.
This is kinda retarded really.
If you make content meant to turn people on, but 'not too much because it's the way I like it', what does it mean exactly?
IMO he's still living with his mom and he's scared that his parents finds out that he's drawing saucy ponies.
And if he ends up drawing porn, he'll burn in hell or smth.
So, either he doesn't have the skills/confidence to draw genitals, he's lazy and doesn't feel like drawing them/learning how to, isn't allowed to, or he's scared of social repercussions.
I mean, I wouldn't want my family know that I'm drawing cartoon porn either, but I'd have the balls to actually say that's why I'm not doing it.

>>29791347
And this is just proof of my 'he's doing it from fear of repercussions'.
If someone from his entourage finds this >>29791282 with a vagina slapped into it, they'll think he made it.

File: 1427405850442.jpg (24KB, 400x402px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x402px

>>29791380
You can argue its for fear of repercussions. I'm not saying it isn't that. I only took issue with your initial claim of "they can't, don't feel like learning, too lazy". In which case that is completely incorrect as from what we've seen. We can both agree that he definitely has the skill set to draw explicit content if he chose to, he just would rather not.

You can argue WHY he chooses not to make it explicit, I have no argument against that. I just am saying that your initial claim is not correct. Maybe he doesn't want to go full-nude due to religious reasons, maybe its social reasons. Whatever it is, he chooses not to go to that level. He could go to that level, he just chooses to stay at suggestive, regardless of what the reason is.

>>29791347
wow what a faggot

File: Lyra.gif (1MB, 1000x1175px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1175px

>>29791429
>we both know he has the skills
no, actually we don't.
>b-but he can draw so much stuff, he could obviously draw a perfect horsepussy if he wanted to!
When was the last time you drew anything anon?

Maybe my initial claim is incorrect, but you have no ways of proving it as such.
So yeah, he's either lazy, hypocrite or a cuck.

>>29791380
Why not go with his own explanation that he just doesn't want to do it? And this >>29791347 pretty much proves that it's on principle for him now. Why is that bad? Why can't a guy just like drawing lewd stuff?

>>29791475
>no, actually we don't
I meant the capability to learn it if necessary.
>when was the last time you drew anything anon?
Yesterday night.

Your initial claim is incorrect because you claimed a definite statement. I showed you how there can be exceptions with a big-name artist. I didn't use myself as an example because you don't know me or my art. The point is you said those are the ONLY reasons. Those are not the only possible reasons. That's the only part of what you're saying that I take argument with.

>>29791154
It's just that porn is where the money is, so to sustain yourself on art alone you HAVE to make porn. Their desires don't really matter here, it's just a fact of life.

>>29791503
>Capability to learn
Yes, so we actually don't know if he can or not.
>Yesterday night
And you still don't know that being able to draw an orange doesn't mean you can draw apples?
You still have ways to go, anon.

>your initial claim is incorrect because... ???
Yes, it was definitive, and unless proven wrong, it 'could' be right.
But then again I went back on what I said and gave the other possible reasons. But the first one is the most obvious.

>>29791489
Why would he care about people editing it if not for fear?
Also no, I don't believe any artist that do 'lewd stuff' without ever doing nsfw just does it because they 'don't want to'. There must be a reason behind it.

I'm sorry if I offended you guys, I didn't expect this random guy to have worshipers here.
But you should use your head a bit more.

>>29791604
>There must be a reason.
Found the underage. Not everything in life makes sense, Anon. What makes perfect sense to you is ludicrous as fuck to someone else.

File: Nightmare_Moon_vector.png (728KB, 1397x1200px) Image search: [Google]

728KB, 1397x1200px

>>29791604
>that first stuff
NCMares made it clear that he does not draw explicit content from his suggestive content because he chooses not to. Like he says, "If I wanted my stuff to have explicit bits, then I'd draw it as such."

Which brings me back to what I'm saying. Artists like himself and I can choose to not to draw explicit art for reasons other than "not being able to or laziness." Artists can make the mental decision, like the both of us, that we would rather keep it at suggestive.

Having the skill-set to go there is irrelevant, which I apologize for bringing up. We choose to keep it suggestive and not go explicit. Not due to inability or incapability, due to preference and choice. That's why I take issue with your statement. We can and do choose to avoid explicit for reasons that are not included in what you said.

File: 1447210028609.gif (60KB, 238x279px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 238x279px

>>29791604
>There must be a reason behind it
This is called "implying".
>I'm sorry if I offended you guys, I didn't expect this random guy to have worshipers here.
>But you should use your head a bit more.
If you're going to try to tell us what we're saying is incorrect, I encourage you not to use the argument of "I don't care as much as you guys, therefore my opinion is more valid", that's a poor argument.

With that being said, no. Drawfags can choose to draw suggestive and then keep it at suggestive because they don't want it to go explicit. You can't make a definitive claim and say that the reason artists don't go there is because they -can't- go there. Artists like NCMares and myself -choose- to not go there.

>>29791643
>not everything in life makes sense
lol
Like what?
Please tell me anon, what does people do that 'doesn't make sense'?
A person doesn't become a serial killer for no reasons.
Or an artist. Or a cop.

So again, unless you can actually give me a rationality driven reason to why he 'wouldn't want' to draw genitals, you're full of shit.

>>29791654
And this goes for you too.
Nonsense doesn't exist.
People like some colors because of reasons, they hate stuff because of other reasons.
Everything has a reason, this 'don't want to draw genitals but still draw stuff to turn people on' is fucking nonsensical.

>>29791604
>Why would he care about people editing it if not for fear?
I don't think he should and caring about editing is ridiculois, but I don't think that at this point it's fear. Maybe he is making a statement here, that no matter what he does people will still chante gibe da pussy b0ss. He can't possibly expect people to not do anything they want with the picture though. If anything, a statement like this is going to immediatly have the opposite effect, which has already happened.
>I don't believe any artist that do 'lewd stuff' without ever doing nsfw just does it because they 'don't want to'
Why not? Do you completely rule out the possibility that he just likes lewd ponies but outright porn just isn't his thing? And if there is a reason, why does it have to be a malicious or shameful one instead of artistic one? Maybe he likes to tease both himself and the viewer. Maybe he thinks that by not drawing explicit porn he dodges the horny teen demographic who will fap to anything with horse pussy on. There can be tons of reasons. Now I don't suggest that it's an good reason, but it's his reason.

>>29791681
>don't want to draw genitals but still draw stuff to turn people on' is fucking nonsensical.
>things I don't understand is nonsensical
No anon, you just don't understand it because you don't share our mindset. We like to draw tastefully suggestive pictures. We don't want to draw pure smut.

>>29791681
>this 'don't want to draw genitals but still draw stuff to turn people on' is fucking nonsensical
Nigga do you not know of softcore porn or gravure idols?

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-03 at 3.10.24 PM.png (97KB, 1034x556px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1034x556px

>>29791681
Also, he literally explains why he only draws suggestive and that he just chooses to not go explicit in >pic related.

It's a choice anon. We choose suggestive things, tasteful things. We don't choose to draw smut.

>>29791725
What a fucking cuck

>>29791730
Doesn't matter what you think of him. The final point is that we choose suggestive and don't choose explicit smut. Saying that all artists don't go suggestive to explicit due to inability or laziness if incorrect. Artists can choose to stay at suggestive willfully, like NCMares and I.

File: 1490500652255.png (21KB, 183x264px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 183x264px

>>29791730
>guy has fun drawing what he likes to draw
>cuck

File: THINK.jpg (78KB, 637x476px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 637x476px

I'm not going to debate this further because you're all obviously too slow to understand.
You don't draw lewd stuff 'just because'.
You draw it because you're horny and/or want others to feel it too.
If you then post said suggestive stuff and then go out of your way to stop people from making it even hotter, it's because you have a reason. Not because 'you don't like it'.

>>29791725
And this is even more retarded than >>29791347

I mean whatever, you're obviously cucked beyond recognition.
Maybe someday you'll open your eyes and see what I meant.

>>29791725
>vajayjays
Can people stop this

>>29791754
>YOURE ALL KEKS
>TOO KEKED TO UNDERSTAND ME IM CORRECT
Anon, we choose to draw suggestive, and don't choose to draw explicit. We can draw whatever we like to draw, stop trying to mentally figure us out. We like suggestive, we don't like explicit smut. That's literally it.

But anyways, thanks for that shitty response. The "You're just too dumb to understand me" argument is really convincing. Anon, you're an autist. We draw what we want and don't draw what we don't want. That's literally fucking it.

>>29791773
>vajayjays
Yah that word was really jarring to read for me too.

>>29791754
>You don't draw lewd stuff 'just because'
Except you obviously do. I don't think you've drawn anything in your life. The real cuck here is you, anon.

>>29791754
>You're all too slow
No, you just have severe autism. Humans can do things for reasons that aren't logical or rational. If that concept is so foreign to you, that's called autism.

>>29791690
>He can't possibly expect people to not do anything they want with the picture though. If anything, a statement like this is going to immediatly have the opposite effect, which has already happened.
yeah it's the streisand effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

>>29791855
Well he was basically asking for it at that point. Though I heard he disregarded 4chan's edit so maybe he was prepared for at least some backlash.

>>29791969
He essentially said, "Oh, 4chan made the edit? Oh, then they were obviously just trying to fuck with me. I'm assuming all edits come from 4chan with the intention to upset me from this point forward."

File: 1426616976662.jpg (21KB, 256x268px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 256x268px

>>29792008
He is not wrong.

File: 003960e8a763422fcf87eed5e0fabc45.1000x750x1.jpg (792KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 1000x750px

>>29792024
Kek.
>tfw normies make edits because they know NC will blame it on 4chan

>>29792008
It really was a shit tier edit though. He thinks that if they get better then we're only trying harder. Shit, I can live with that if it means we get some quality horse pussy.

File: 1487520617526.jpg (106KB, 1280x715px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1280x715px

>>29792034
Well played, you brilliant horsefuckers.

File: 1487876727988.png (160KB, 396x403px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 396x403px

>>29782244
>>29782852
>>29785679
>>29786740
>>29787423
>>29791089
>>29791144
It feels good to know there are still people here who are pure. I'm proud of you, anons.

>>29790879
Yes, it still is, you retard. Sex with non humans = zoophilia, or bestiality, if you prefer.

>>29791750
He sounds like a prude t b h

>>29791816
Not him, but what kind of things?

File: mlps5e15raritynoircouch.jpg (54KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 800x450px

>>29791020
how does one NOT get turned on by this?

>>29792394
That would be xenophilia, stupid.
You can't compare IRL horses or other animals and ponies.

I just like watching ponies do cute things

>>29792629
It lacks subtlety and grace. She tries too hard. It's also a humanlike pose so it seems a bit off, namely the shoulders. It's a no from me.

>>29791347
It's fine that he decides not to do explicit, but a fanartist has no right to tell other people what they can create. He's drawing lewds of someone else's character designs. Others should have the same right to make explicit edits to his drawings.

File: large.png (437KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1000x1000px

>>29782150
It's semantics, really. If jerking it to mlp makes you furry, then we're all just furries. Furries are decried here because before mlp came along, furries were just these things, ya know https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/84/e6/b5/84e6b520a921e8119e6bbbd8bfcdcde2.jpg. Ponyfags like ponies, not 'classical' furshit. Pic related. We are here for the ponies. Not for "furry-ized" anthro horse-things. We have not interest in furry stuff, and furry stuff is not pony and so does not belong. That's why furries and ponyfags don't get along. So if you ask a true ponyfag if he's a furry, the answer is always no. It's been a long time though, and now, unfortunately, there are lots of actual furries here who just fap to ponies on the side or whatever. Things are so intermingled these days that it isn't cut and dry like it used to be. Ponyfags are probably at least half furry anymore. And then of course, there is the matter of whether being a furry is just about liking anthroshit or if you have to fap to it.

All that being said, however you chose to think about it, duh, of course there are people out there who don't fap to it. That's a stupid question. Do you think maybe there are people out there you don't have sex, too? Or don't drink? Do you think it's possible to live life and not do those things?

File: actually.gif (135KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 200x200px

>>29793084
>Do you think maybe there are people out there you don't have sex, too?

>>29782150
>brony
>furry
Im-fucking-plying.

>>29792639
They're still ponies; animals, you dingus, whether you like it or not.

>>29793084
>Do you think maybe there are people out there you don't have sex, too?
>Do you think it's possible to live life and not do those things?
Yes? I genuinely laughed. Do you even know where you are right now, casualboy?
Damn, that was a funny one.

>>29793351
That's the point, ya dingus.

>Do you think it's possible to partake in this fandom and not fap to ponies?

No shit. Of course, you retard. That's a stupid question on par with:

>Do you think maybe there are people out there who don't have sex, too?
>Do you think it's possible to live life and not do those things?

>>29793391
Oh, yeah. I'm kinda sleepy.
Disregard that, I suck cocks.

>>29793351
>They're still animals
How? Why?
Because they look lile horses?
Okay I'll try to get trough your redneck's skull one last time.

Fast forward 400 years in the future.
We space colony, all that shit, whatever Sci-fi you want.
We find aliens, they're intelligent. They can think by themselves, are civilized, can talk, can even do mathematics.
What would you call the first man fucking that alien? A zoophile?
No, you fucking dumbass.
And no I'm sorry anon, fucking a nigger doesn't make you a zoophile either.
Maybe an abo, I'll have to think about that.

>>29793461
Ponies are ponies. Just because they know how to talk, it doesn't mean they're not ponies. If it's not with a human, it's zoophilia, simple as that. Not only that, but aliens are animals too, since an animal is a living organism characterized by voluntary movement.

>fucking a nigger doesn't make you a zoophile
That's because, memes aside, niggers are part of the human species.

File: 676098ce8d71dffb37f858c5807647bb.png (2MB, 1280x945px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x945px

>>29793750
I dunno what to tell you anon.
Get educated.

>>29793750
>aliens are animals too
Xenophilia covers that, not zoophilia. And don't forget that humans are animals too if you want to be this technical.

>>29793750
If an animal is a living organism characterized by voluntary movement, then humans are animals and having sex with one is also zoophilia.

Or we could acknowledge that there's a difference between sapient and non-sapient animals, and therefore MLP's ponies fall into a separate category altogether from what we have on Earth.

>>29782150

File: 1488157223243.jpg (18KB, 310x309px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 310x309px

>>29793461
>fucking a nigger doesn't make you a zoophile

>>29791154
>1+1=3
Fixed

>>29791181
Damn that's some solid logic

Good job being smart, fag

Very hilarious rationalizations, would laugh at again

>>29791475
>that bottom "hand"

Where exactly is that finger going? Is it just supposed to press against the back of the balls or is it going in the out ramp?

>>29793457
Don't worry Anon, so do I

>>29785505
>extremely lewd

Where?

>>29793750

What if I fuck a dwarf? Is fucking dwarves zoophilia?

File: teleports behind u.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x281px

>>29782226
>human like in nature
they have prey eyes, their faces aren't even human. look at any picture of a pony from 3/4ths behind or even profile. normal human's eyes aren't on the sides of your head like that.

File: 1353708529048.gif (2MB, 783x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 783x720px

>>29795531
The finger goes wherever you want it to go anon.
But minthorse wants to put it up your ass

>>29796453
I'm just going to throw this out there anon, but are you aware that we're talking about magical cartoon ponies?
They basically break 80% of nature's biological rules just by being alive.
When that guy said 'humanlike in nature' he obviously meant their general behavior. You know, creating a civilization, a working economy, a hierarchy, having social interactions, jokes, songs.. Human shit?

>>29782166
>Does fapping to the porn make you an actual furry?

Depends on who you ask. Normies would consider it the same thing.

>>29782166
>anthropomorphization
I hate to break it to you, but talking animals with human expressions is anthropromorphizing.

You're trying to generalize anthros as animal heads on Human bodies, but that's only one expression of it.
The M&M mascots are anthros. The Brave little Toaster is Anthro...

File: 934_cast-away-original-castaway-418346274.jpg (168KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1280x720px

>>29796800
Wilson...

File: 960.jpg (59KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 960x540px

>>29796813
no one has to know.

File: tmp_12051-667837-6522334.png (690KB, 820x1027px) Image search: [Google]

690KB, 820x1027px

>>29796800
Shut the fuck up with that garbage already. You, and every other smartass in the fandom, know exactly what we mean when we say 'anthro'. You aren't going to change anybody's mind and you aren't doing anything to defend your shitty taste in porn. You are just being contentious and anoying.

File: Starlight_biting_her_lower_lip_S6E1.png (697KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

697KB, 1280x720px

>>29791475
>>29796621
>Getting some anal magic fingering from Lyra
I can only get so erect.

File: 1488117431271.jpg (191KB, 900x1600px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 900x1600px

>>29792034
>tricks people in improving drawing skills by making edits
Was this his endgame all along?

>Everyone's a little bit furry
>Sometimes.
>Doesn't mean we go
>Around committing sex crimes.
>Look around and you will find
>No one's really species blind.
>Maybe it's a fact
>We all concur
>Everyone makes judgments
>Based on fur.

>>29793223
This. Why do people mix up the two?

>>29800057
I would imagine that for an outsider there's little difference between the two.