Why does everybody lose their shit when someone says they want

>>29521434
>no hooves

>>29521434
Elitism and memes.
I want to fuck an human girl around my own age after getting in a relationship with her.

They don't.
People lose their shit when someone says they would never fuck a pony, because it's usually just normie moralizing.

>>29521434
>no hooves

>>29521452
It's wrong to fuck ponies

File: Take it you slut.png (461KB, 870x722px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 870x722px

>>29521470

>there are one thousand places for other things than ponies
>there is a single place for ponies
>you come exactly to that single place to talk exactly about non-pony

GEE I WONDER? MAYBE HAVING MORE THAN ONE BRAIN CELL WOULD WORK?

>>29521470
>inb4 reddit screencap thread

File: hmmmmmm.png (452KB, 1029x710px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1029x710px

>>29521470
Im this world maybe since they arent sentient creatures.
But wouldnt you fuck an intelligent pony consensually?

>>29521434
>everybody
idc. i'd fuck most mammals

>>29521492
>since they arent sentient creatures
i dare you to fuck a mare against her will

File: 1478592981856.gif (64KB, 329x262px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 329x262px

>>29521470
(You) shut up.

>>29521452
basically this

>>29521492
>But wouldnt you fuck an intelligent pony consensually?
No, that's sick and immoral

>>29521434
Because you should fuck off to /a/ or /s/

>>29521492
Horses are sentient. It's sapience they lack. Sentience is the ability to feel and react to stimuli, while sapience means to be like a human, specifically mentally.

>>29521627
That's debated.
Regardless, they can't give consent. That's the big issue.

>>29521588
I just realized I haven't once clicked on /s/ and I've been here for a long time.

File: knuckles my mistake.png (148KB, 327x452px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 327x452px

>>29521627
Fugg I tend to get them wrong.
But at least you got what I meant.

File: 1300590403924.png (137KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 300x300px

>>29521644
>they can't give consent

File: 1485874636337.png (398KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1200x1200px

>>29521470

>being this gay

>>29521434
Because some people have been on here so long they can only fap to pone

File: RD Shiggy.png (389KB, 633x606px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 633x606px

>>29521669
>A non-sapient animal being manipulated through sexual stimulation = cognitive consent on their part

>>29521804
>a horse can't tell if she wants sex or not purely on her own free will
>"manipulations" make a difference here

>>29521823
if there's grass on the field, play ball

>>29521823
>Implying the concept of freewill applies to a creature that has no intelligent understanding of said concept
>"Manipulation doesn't make a difference" when one party is de facto more intelligent and capable of making such a cognitive decision

>>29521872
you should said that you're a retard from the beginning. would save me keystrokes

>>29521872
>disabled people don't have free will

File: HAHAHAHA FAGGOT.png (423KB, 590x634px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 590x634px

>>29521882
Not an argument.
Thanks for conceding, though.

>>29521572
>one consensual, sapient creature fucks another sapient, consensual creature

the keyword being sapient; there is literally nothing wrong with this.

>>29521572
Ok time to leave thread and clop just because of you.

>>29521892
by all means, go fuck a mare against her will. maybe you'll learn something
or just die, even better

>>29521899
It's wrong to fuck anything that isn't human

>>29521888
Depends on the disability. Would you say that the severely mentally disabled are truly capable of free will despite their disability? Wouldn't that be the definition of "disabled", being they lack the same abilities normally applied to others?

>>29521917
>A mare can physically stop you from having sex with her
Yes, and a dog can bite someone trying to pet them. It's not indicative of an intelligent assessment of consent, but rather a simplistic reactionary effect.

I wouldn't participate in sexual activity with a dumb real-life animal in any case. Literal bestiality is degenerate and abnormal.

>>29521434
>op is actually on the front page
my fucking sides

>>29521932
says who?

>>29521960
once again
>>29521882

>>29521963
God

>>29521963
Not him, but biology would say so considering most species of creatures are biologically only compatible with others in their species.

>>29521972
Once again
>>29521892

If you can't prove me wrong, just say so. No shame in admitting you can't m8 ;^)

>>29521932
>there have been several distinct species of human in the development of human history
>the modern anatomical human has existed for a relatively short period of time

What do you think your ancestors were doing hundreds of thousands of years ago before Homo sapiens sapiens was the solitary form of humans on earth? Do you think they cared? Are other species of humans what you would define as 'human'? If so; when does 'human' stop and 'monkey' begin? Are you suggesting it's okay to fuck a chimpanzee?

Tl;dr you are basically talking a lot of hot shit inspired by religion and 'MUH GOD FEARING VALUES.'

>>29521979
>argumenting with a retard
mare will prove you wrong the hard way
> ;^)
pretending is not trolling

>>29521988
>>there have been several distinct species of human
That is false
>hundreds of thousands of years ago
The world is 6,000 years old

>>29521978
bullshit. God never said such thing

File: IMG_0717.jpg (23KB, 176x286px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 176x286px

>>29521470

>>29521994
Yeah yeah sure lad
Maybe someday you'll be ready for truth instead of psuedoscientific creationist shit made up on the spot by degenerate American protestants

File: tip harder faggot.png (243KB, 829x589px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 829x589px

>>29522018

>29521994
You don't get any more (You)'s from me. Follow the example of our lord and nail gun yourself to some 2 by 4s. But Before that, go back to >>/pol/ and or >>/his/ with that defeatist non-argument bullshit desu

>t. pagan

I'd rather a deer to be honest.

>>29521994
>yfw there are people right now still believing in god in 20xx
>yfw they aren't on this board but people are still taking the bait anyway
Mmmmmbreddy gud :DDDD

>>29521996
Not him again, but there are excerpts from the bible that speak against defiling oneself through sexual acts with beasts and by faith the bible is considered the word of God.

I'm non-religious btw

>>29522032
/k/ pls

>>29522022
*tsk tsk tsk*
Unfortunately posting a silly hat is not an argument, /pol/ack
*pats ur head*
Don't worry though
Just pick up a 9th grade level biology textbook and learn what your daddy beat out of you :3

>>29522048
there are parts in the bible that imply that god said things but the beastiality part is not one of them

>>29521979
Biology only tells me who i can reproduce with. Not who I can have sex with.

>>29521978
>tips bible

but for real, im not religious so that doesn't apply to me

>>29521979
different species can not only copulate but in some occasions even have an offspring

>>29522048
>/k/ pls
Not my fault the tiny legs and butt are so exciting.

Why do the worst, normalfaggish threads always come up from mobilefags?
Jesus Christ...