Will this shot lancer shoot beams or shells? Are there any perks

>>15824210
Beams have more penetration than solid projectiles, which is both an asset and a detriment. It's good, because it's much harder to armor against them. It's bad, because it's much easier to cause collateral damage with them. That's why shot lancers were invented in the first place, to have a weapon that can punch through armor but not too far.

File: lancer.jpg (162KB, 850x1214px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 850x1214px

>>15824210
it shoots lancers

>>15824643
>Beams have more penetration than solid projectiles, which is both an asset and a detriment. It's good, because it's much harder to armor against them. It's bad, because it's much easier to cause collateral damage with them. That's why shot lancers were invented in the first place, to have a weapon that can punch through armor but not too far.

TY, senpai.

File: Lancer_Robotech_The _New_Generation.jpg (53KB, 680x479px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 680x479px

>>15824645
GOD DAMMIT, CARLOS!

>>15824210
Beam + physical weapon combo are also great against special snowflake defenses like I-Field, GN-Field, Beam Shields and etc.

>>15824643
I'm pretty sure that there's also the whole "minovsky reactors causing giant colony damaging explosions when damaged by beam weapons" thing

>>15826398
Yeah I was considering that also. I thought shot lancers were only designed to prevent reactor explosions until I saw a Zoloat get stabbed with one and blow up desu.

>>15826624
There's regular explosion and then there's turbo critical explosion.

Check Gundam Unicorn. That ReZEL that was lying on its back and got funneled. It turbo explodes instead of regular explodes. They even make a huge scene about it.