>"B-b-but Seed Destiny is totally worse you guys!"

Gundam is dead.

>>15513095
IBO's models at 10 meters are on the same level of quality as Destiny's closeups.

>>15513110
Not even close, felcher gundam's is worse than Destiny's.

>>15513113
Impossible. A style thats off-model often is still preferable to a style that looks awful even when it's on-model.

File: a failure of animation.png (234KB, 679x449px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 679x449px

>>15513154
>A style thats off-model often is still preferable to a style that looks awful even when it's on-model.
I can tell from this you never watched Iron Menstruation (they are not even on-model half the time anyway). Anything Destiny is guilty of IBO does just as much if not worse.

>>15513166
I have watched it. I've also seen these images you post. Every single thread. It's a lot easier on the eyes than Destiny even if the production value is poor. Like I said, the key difference is that even though Destiny delivers the visuals it wanted to more often those visuals and the aesthetic behind them are bad.

>>15513175
>It's a lot easier on the eyes than Destiny even if the production value is poor.
Said the fake gundam fan. Stop living in your own bubble, the title for worst belongs to a new gundam.

>>15513095
Because unlike Destiny there was no care involved.
>>15513175
Lie harder.