>Blame this on the misfortune of your birth. Don't take

>>15486837

He meant he has a stomach ulcer and needed to go take some Pepto-Bismol, he just has a tendency to the cryptic because he's bad at expressing himself.

>>15486837
He meant that he has never betrayed anyone in his life, EVER.

File: delet.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>15486874
delet this

Char is actually Garma's father

>>15486837
"Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm getting you killed because your dad killed my dad."

>>15486874
I miss the shitty translation of this line.

>>15486874
And why would anyone distrust Char?

He didn't murder Garma or Kycillia out of revenge. It was all THE RAVAGES OF WAR.

>>15486874
>>15486917
>If I killed a person I am guilty of murder
>If I killed my father I am guilty of murder and of breaking my filial duty
>"This man was an asshole that didn't work, spent all our family money on booze and beat us up. He is NOT my father"
>I feel no filial duty.
>Therefore I am not guilty of murder.
How deduction works according to /m/.

>>15486955
He killed Garma just by his relation to the Zabis even though he was a baby when his dad died

>>15486959
What in the world are you talking about and how is it relevant to what I said?

>>15486959

He was the same age as Char, so he was about 8 when Deikun died. Young and certainly uninvolved, but not a baby by any stretch.

>>15486955
Kinslaying isn't just about filial duty dude

>>15489582
What is it about then?
From purely moral perspective you should love (and thus not kill) your kin because they also love you. From an ethical perspective the reason doesn't matter - you "must not kill" because it's your "duty"."Duty" is not something you question - it is simply a law but a law in itself need not have moral implications.
If you kill your father you can be convicted of patricide according to the law, but if you did not consider this man your father you are not morally obligated to see yourself as a kinslayer. A murderer - yes, but not kinslayer.

In our case Haman is not trying to bring Char to justice, nor is she is blaming him for murder or deception or anything like that. She is just trying to guilt trip him about not fulfilling a "duty" he does not consider himself morally obligated to fulfill which is helping Zeon gain dominance over Earth Sphere. He, in general, is not the kind of person that would care about such a thing as "duty" if he found that duty against his personal values i.e. he does not consider that the concept of "duty" in itself is worth anything. Hence the infamous phrase.

Is there a part that's hard to understand?