Do you think it holds up today? I think it is incredibly impressive

I never watched it

File: mvtv-2001007.gif (469KB, 480x225px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 480x225px

>>15472929
It's a very nice film.
But it needs to be the only source of noise since like half the movie is just background noise, so if you've got a fridge and an AC and everything whirring it takes away a lot.

I find myself watching 2010 a lot more. It works better as a thing you leave going in the background while you do stuff.

Books are better, even if the go fucking batshit towards the end.

>>15473536
>Books are better,
I like Arthur C Clarke a lot, but you're wrong here.

>when you trick your friends into watching a "movie" and it's 2001
they fall asleep every time. Or worse, end up annoyed or confused
It's really really hard to make a modern audience appreciate this when the special effects aren't impressive to their eyes like it was decades ago

Pretty good visually, ok plot, a must watch for every sci-fi enthusiast, just don't forget NASA help them and "was an immoral" experiment.

>>15473536
>even if the go fucking batshit towards the end.
Can we all agree that Halman was fucking stupid?

>>15473683
>just don't forget NASA help them and "was an immoral" experiment.
christ I hate ESL posters.
what the fuck did you mean by this?