Paul Jensen reviews Heavy Object: http://www.animenewsnetwo

>>15095184
WHO THE FUCK CARES
FUCK OFF

It's about ethics in anime journalism

>>15095184

> criticising math
> no math in picture

>>15095184
What is with your autistic obsession with ANN?

>>15095204
actually there is, the lettering scale goes 0 to 12 with F to A+, the math does not add up when averaging

>>15095216

Except that's not math, and an overall score isn't (or at least, is not necessarily) a clean average of other explicit scores. There's no individual metrics for characters, no metric for pacing, no metric for setting and probably for other things the viewer could conceivably care for and the reviewer has possibly (though not definitely) talked about in the article and folded in to an "overall" category, because the scoring would look to busy and be needlessly involved if you listed everything separately.

>>15095216
Averaging only makes sense if every single grade is weighted the same, which is a pretty stupid thing to do for reviews.

>>15095237
t. ANN

>>15095184
>uh oh
>A perfectly reasonable review that does a pretty good job explaining the pros and cons of the series and what kind of audience would want to watch it
Wow, it's fucking nothing. Unless this is some kind of subtle attempt at getting people on a mongolese tapestry board to read ANN.