what is /m/'s take on robocraft? not the old robocraft.

>>14976188
It's been garbage for well over a year.
Don't bring it up again or I'll dig up my rage-induced rants about the game and why it and its developers are all huge shits.

I left when they replaced currency with random loot boxes, everything was shit at that time.

>>14976311
>a year

Way, way the fuck longer, son.

Isn't the game now purely pay to win?

quality balance as always
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wPdGy4Dzw8

>>14976188
robocrap?

File: 1474146878486.png (242KB, 492x362px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 492x362px

>>14976339
It's been more?
Time flies.

I have over 300 hours in it. Haven't played in 9+ months. I was really holding out hope for it, but the devs just can't seem to make it fun, profitable, and balanced all at once.

That said the building is actually pretty fun, if they ever manage to make the game really good again I would love to go back and play more.

>reinstalled
>played TDM
It's obviously rigged as fuck. I got max 1 win per 5 matches. The enemy had more than 3x more CPU than me. Even when I bought a max CPU bot it got destroyed immediately while I couldn't damage anyone. Everything made it very obvious they wanted me to lose as much as possible.
It's pointless to play this shit.

>>14977409
Yes, they they're targeting specifically you.

>>14976314
>replaced currency with random loot boxes
I sure love modern multiplayer games.

File: Sunwalker Mk.I.jpg (515KB, 1640x991px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 1640x991px

Robocraft, ironically, was much more complex when they had less features.

I remember the days when making fliers was something special. Pic related, though not my creation.

>>14977441
you are fucking retarded
they are targeting free players you fucking retard
paying idiots probably get better matchmaking