Hey, remember when we said feminists want to ban sex bots?

>>14967091
maybe if women weren't so terrible, we wouldn't want to shack up with robots instead

>No! You can't fuck my pussy!
>WHAT??!? No! You can't fuck that robot pussy either!

I'm all for keeping men out of female reproductive rights, just like I am for keeping women out of male masturbation rights.

>>14967091
Feminists want to ban sex bots for the same reason third parties are silently discouraged in elections.

They don't want people to notice there's a better alternative, which means competition and a loss in power over others.

>>14967091
We live in a world where Armitage III is happening, minus the Mars colonization.

>>14967091
What I don't understand is how would a sex robot be more sexist then a dildo ?

On that note , would they not be building male sex robots for women too?

Hysterical feminists with made up degree can complain all they want. At the end of the day the all mighty dollar rules. If there's a market for them (which there will be) someone will build them and sell them.
Even if they are illegal we could probably just buy them modularly, build a gf over time.

>>14967106
>just buy them modularly, build a gf over time.

Time for Armored Core waifus.

Well, feminists are predictable, I'm going to say that.

>>14967091
Good luck, there is simply no actual way to defeat the porn industry

File: getting good.webm (873KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

873KB, 500x500px

>>14967091
>women: everything is offensive

what else, oh yeah the water is wet

>implying feminists bitching ever got anything done
Just like tobacco and booze right

Greed trumps everything. If sex bots are gonna sell, you bet your ass people are gonna buy

>>14967091
Sex dolls already exist.

Has no one seen the episode of tosh with the sex doll repair man?

>>14967152
yeah but somebody on a website said something so clearly the THEMs are about to kick in your door and literally kill you

>tfw kind of afraid to have sex with a robot
I just can't shake the feeling of my peanus weenus getting wedged into some accidentally exposed gears.

>>14967153
>implying they aren't going to be the ones cashing in it.
Sometimes I wonder if the illuminati tries to tell us we can't do something just to make us want to do it more.

>>14967091
This bitch won't be able stop anything.

>>14967099
/thread
emma watson sexbots when

>>14967091
feminist are retards. their ideology just blow off everything.
whatever they think is right will be right, even it defying science & common senses.

>>14967098
so what they want actually eh?
they should be captured, tied down & fucked like there's no tomorrow, in the end of the day they'll beg for more dicks into their pussy all day long.
by that time those feminist will know what they want in their life eventually.

>>14967106
> At the end of the day the all mighty currency rules
ftfy

>>14967091
What I want to know is are we going to get variations on how robot looking the sex bots will be?

>>14967091
In what way does this even APPROACH making sense?

>>14967091
>Robots are property
Wow, what a racist.

You hear them, ladies. Your vibrators are now contraband.

File: 1370394335324.jpg (197KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 800x600px

>>14967154
sounds like you've been on /m/ too long if this is your first fear about robot sex.

you shouldn't fear the robot anon, embrace it.

>someone might make sex dolls that look like children so we should ban all sex dolls
Someone might molest real children so we should ban all sex.

>>14967247
That's the plan!

>>14967247

>someone might make sex dolls that look like children so we should ban all sex dolls

Sooo... They're upset that someone might make an outlet so that pedophiles don't rape children? Why are feminists pro child rape?

>>14967091

>Guys, a literal who has an opinion
>I'll post it so we can get angry and shake our pitchforks at vague concept that we feel we should oppose

This amount of echo chambering is pretty cringeworthy desu. Where's your dignity?

>>14967262

>dignity
>4chan
>laughingwhores.jpg

>>14967262
>Guys we shouldn't express our opinion
>Sharing your opinion is pretty cringeworthy
Ok.

>>14967262
>Look I'm saying something different than most of you! Aren't I unique and special?

>>14967279

I'm sorry did I trigger you?

>>14967293
I'm sorry, did I trigger you?

>>14967262
True 4chan is kill tho

>>14967099
>for the same reason third parties are silently discouraged in elections
Not to turn this into a /pol/ thread, but the real reason third parties never win in the US presidential elections these days is because they field pants-on-head retarded candidates who are objectively worse than either of the candidates fielded by the two main parties. They can do okay to good work in local offices (one of the former mayors of my city was a Libertarian), but at the national level they're so inherently weak that they may as well not bother. Their whole strategy is backwards anyways, you're supposed to build good candidates from the ground up and field them into Congressional offices and then gun for the Presidency, not go straight for the Presidency (where they'll have zero support in Congress even if they do win) and use that as a recruiting tool for the lower-down offices.

>>14967106
>>14967122
>>14967152
>>14967239
These, it's not like sexual aids haven't already existed for decades.

>>14967260
One-sided morality policing, just like what caused Prohibition.

>>14967262
I post it because I want to prove there's a feminist campaign wanting to ban sex bots.

It's no more fear mongering.

Japan doesn't give a fuck.