/m/ merc you have bought, but feel really ripped off about

File: PC308796.jpg (33KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 480x640px

Not ripped off because I got it for cheap, but pic related is the only /m/ toy I regret buying. It looks good, but it's so fucking flimsy. It can barely hold a basic standing pose without falling over, let alone anything more dynamic. I have 14 other SRCs and this is the only bad one.

>>14941706
posting outhers

>>14941726
What did you buy it off?

>>14941732
Got it at a toy show for 20 bucks.

File: 18946754618954.jpg (57KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1280x720px

>>14941706

My 1:100 FW Gundam Standart MSA-0011 is a piece of shit. None all the parts constantly fall off and some parts are even warped. Think I paid like $40 for this crap.

File: bann01870_0_1441587232.jpg (134KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 600x450px

Not exactly ripped off since it was only like three bucks but still, this is one of the dumbest things Bandai has ever come up with.
The Frame Mode is utterly pointless and fragile, Robot Mode is barely posable and unsightly due to all the attachment points and Weapon Mode kinda pointless since I surely won't buy another one.
You can't really paint them since they're made out of polypropylene and the flexible parts have stress marks.

>>14941829
>$40
I feel real bad for you.

>>14942070
Dude, they allow you snap the pieces back into a runner. This means that for mere 3 bucks, you have INFINITE SNAP-FITTING. That Snapfit trip guy will have a tremendous orgasm if you gift him that.

File: ugh.png (199KB, 491x368px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 491x368px

>>14941706
>Rayearth