I have some questions about truth here, but I wont phrase them

File: Matisse.jpg (80KB, 740x552px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 740x552px

I have some questions about truth here, but I wont phrase them interrogatively in hopes of creating discussion.

Multiple construals are happening at any time and through convergence we find what we believe is truth.

They think truth to be what most accurately describes reality, but might I irk you to consider truth as merely incidental to being human (Like the purpose of color on fruit)?

Another thing:


>Jordan Peterson
>Ben Shapiro
>Sam Harris
>Stefan Molyneux
>Any famous personality who garnered a large following through pandering or garrulousness

These are all just sophists, making captious objections upon another and others. Replete with casuistry, false confidence, double downing, and biases in protection of ego so as to not render past efforts futile or meaningless.

These are the speakers to whom our curious neighbors listen and perhaps direct their less curious friend.

I ask you to consider:

Is this the cream from our strain?
Are these thinkers results of a selection of the lay masses, or the learned?
Why can't we offer more?

After some consideration I believe we are heading for some sort of terrarium style reality of the apt and inept.