how important is experience when writing a novel? I've heard from many sources that you need to experience a lot of life to write a truly wise work, but then I see also that a lot of good writers, like Proust and Joyce, lived relatively boring and eventless lives. What do you gentlemen think?
>>9957282
I don't think it's a conditio sine qua non. As long as there is imagination and experience gained from other readings there is no actual need of an eventful life, but a plain one will do
STYLE
OVER
SUBSTANCE
LIFE RESPONSABILITIES
>>9957315
what does sine qua non mean. I don't speak you fancy little gay language, champ
>>9957346
Google, you idiot. Also
>he doesn't know standard latin quotes
GTFO pleb
>>9957282
depends on the subject matter. to write a story about love, you need to have been in love. i seriously cringe when i think about what i wrote in my notebook re: women before i had actually been in a relationship with one. any amount of research regarding human relationships is insufficient compared to the real deal.
i don't think you need any specific "work experience" to be a writer, though. jean auel wrote a pretty damn good novel about cavemen and she was never a caveman. coupland wrote a pretty damn good novel about software engineers without being a software engineer.
>>9957498
>notebook re: women
pls post
>>9957282
you experience just as much in a boring life as an eventful one, it's just different experience. great writing is about understanding and expressing that experience, not its content.
>>9957282
People say they need more experience as an excuse to put off writing. Just fucking write.