Are "transcendence" and "everything" mutually

I think it depends on your ontology, for example with buddhist ontology (dependent origination) nothing really transcends anything else, whereas with say Kants system, the noumena transcends the noumenal

>Are "transcendence" and "everything" mutually incompatible terms?

Here I think this is a somewhat misuse of "transcendence", as in you're making it into an object or thing, whereas in normal talk we use the word as a way of talking about the relation between two things "the external worlds transcends my personal experience, or, x transcends y", rather than 'transcendence' being an actual thing itself to discuss.

What people fail to realize is that we have already transcended.
Consciousness is transcendence.

>>9936826

So if we define the Universe as everything, and say that something transcends the Universe. Does it still transcend the Universe, or is it in the same set as [everything = Universe], and we rename this new set as the Universe?