Has there been any philosophic attempts to theorize about the

>>9934201
I think SCUM Manifesto was like that but I don't read chick books.

File: Sigmund Freud.jpg (41KB, 756x784px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 756x784px

>>9934201

Who hurt you

File: 16710355daeea9389a5c515b0713b68c.jpg (876KB, 1491x1062px) Image search: [Google]

876KB, 1491x1062px

read the underground notes, some nietzsche, eugenics, artificial selection, nazism etc

also, fuck off fascist scum

Not theory, but Crime and Punishment deals with this idea in someways, though Dostoyevsky ends up refuting the idea.

>the brain on full New Sincerity

>>9934249
I think that book was about all men. This is about the sort of people who browse /r9k/. You know the type, just utterly worthless and vile. The sort of "people" all fully human people want to get rid of, male or female.

>>9934294
You say /r9k/ but I'd take robots over niggers any day.

>>9934310
Thanks for letting me know

This is such a Dunning-Kruger reality we live in.

There's always someone who thinks some other bunch of people are worthless, and you're always going to be worthless to someone.
I think people get this way, they get this false self-confidence, because for a large part of their lives they really ARE the smartest fuck in the room.
Well, guess what, pinhead, there's smart people out there so smart they think your intellectual heroes are akin to toddlers playing with their own poop.

It's all relative.
For what it's worth, OP, I think we should start the pogrom with YOU.

>>9934438
Don't pretend like the only issue with /r9k/-types is their stupidity.

>>9934443

I didn't.
What I mean is that Dunning-Kruger effect can apply to more than just intelligence.

You can have an inaccurate perception of your own patheticness or any other quality.
I can guarantee you right now that many other people see you as utterly pathetic.
In fact, I do right now.

>we really want to demoralize you but we know it's not working