>What are you reading there anon? >...."Lolita"?

>>9934079
>implying most normies even know what Lolita is
You overestimate their literary knowledge.

>>9934086
Wrong, op is surprisingly correct.

>>9934086
Normies judge books by their title, anon.

>>9934090
The word lolita is only associated with pedophilia because of the contents of the book though. This is circular logic.

>>9934090
Many people in Gen Z atleast probably have no idea what the book is even about.

>>9934079
My older sister asked me if it was a pornographic book, I just said no because explaining it would sound worse.

>>9934101
>>9934098
Most people know that the term "Lolita" is related to underage girls.

Lol no but you dickheads will cling to anything that demonizes me

"age is just a number"

>>9934469
Everything is just numbers

File: Illustrerad_Verldshistoria_band_I_Ill_107.jpg (1MB, 1541x2345px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1541x2345px

>>9934660
NO

>>9934086

there was a massively popular hollywood adaptation of the book in the 90s

literally everyone born before or around then knows it

you are not special

>>9934086
I remember in high school, in one of my English classes, none of my classmates, or the teacher would shut the fuck up about the book. Literally everyone would talk about it, and weirdly enough, try to bring it up whenever possible. Is the book really that good, or nah? I've been thinking about putting it on the reading list, but I don't want to get meme'd.

>>9935000
>You are not special

Trips of Truth. OP, you don't get a sticker for knowledge of one of the most read pieces of modern lit. Loli is literally a porn category.

>>9935098
I can't tell if this guy is just levelling or what

>>9935074
It's gud, don't fall for the "meme" meme - that's a meme

>>9934090
not like here where we judge street signs by their appearance in little squares

>>9935469
I swear to God, if I have to click a picture of a leopard of cheetah when it says jaguar I might loose my shit.

>>9935074
The prose is a high water mark

>>9935074
It's great, give it a try.

>oh look at me
>i'm intentionally reading a book people associate with pedophilia, in public
>it's not really pedophilia tho
>or maybe it is, but muh prose somehow makes up for it being a shit book
Eddgggyyyyyyyyy

>Antis on defamation again
Pedophiles are better people than you.

>>9934469
Jail is just a room

>>9934079
More like:
>EVERY FOCKING ONE IN THE WORLD! LISTEN TO ME! I AM READING "LOLITA"! IN THIS BOOK THE OLD MAN COOKS THE OUTAGED SHOUMOTA RIGHT IN HER...
>Eeeeew... anon, are you a pedophile??!