Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: francis-bacon.jpg (43KB, 441x419px) Image search:
[Google]
43KB, 441x419px
What does /lit/ think of the Baconian theory of Shakespeare authorship? As far as I can tell there's no real evidence it happened, but also no evidence otherwise...
>first day of class on shakespeare
>someone asks professor if shakespeare wrote under a pseudonym or the plays were written by someone else
>professor says "We're not supposed to discuss that in this english department, but I will say that i've not seen a shred of evidence that this occurred, yet it is interesting that this theory keeps coming up, and..."
>suddenly random girl has a seizure
>everyones in panic while we get campus health
>class dismissed
Somewhat suspicious to me.
>>
>>9931188
I WILL MAKE A JOKE ABOUT SHAKESPEARE WAS BLACK
THEN YOU SAY 'WE WAS A KING'
OP
DID U KNOW
SHAKESPEARE WAS BLACK WOMEN AND WHITE DESTROY HER LEGACY THROUGH RIGHT WING??HEHE MAKE THE MEME
>>
>>9931198
Don't EVER post in my thread without my permission again.
>>
The Marlowe theory is my favourite. Makes for a good story.
>>
>>9931240
didn't marlowe die before shakespeare's later works?
>>
>>9931198
WEW UZ KANGZ N SHIET.
>>
>>9931188
Does anyone ever question the authorship or Da Vinci? Or Rembrandt? Why is it simply so hard to believe someone could have that level of talent
>>
There is nothing more plebian than discussing alternate Shakespeare authorship. It's literally only done by edgy pseuds.
>>
>>9931242
Yeah but the conspiracy is that he faked his death and took on his psudeonym full time. It's bullshit but just my favourite version
>>
>>
>>9931278
what are some cool things i can talk about in section to get litcred?
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1