What would you say it's the mark of a work of art that

Please put together a coherent post next time, thank you

>>9927726
Those two sentences make sense and you know it.

>>9927682
>What would you say it's the mark of a work of art that coming from the lowest of society makes it into academia's taste?
No, all academia is full of retards peddling the behemoth along for career purposes. They have nothing substantial to say about anything.

>When some experimental piece comes into play, what's the difference between "the king's new dress" and something of true meaning?
"true meaning"? What kind of vague, meaningless shit is this? This is a non-question, true meaning doesn't exist, if you mean something unique then what makes it unique is that it hasn't been done before, obviously.

As the other poster said, put together something coherent next time. It's like you tried to sound as pretentious as possible without actually saying anything, very much like academia.