>I do not ordinarily make prophecies, but about this I am

sperm

>Thinking it ever was rational

>>9925585
so much this

>>9925592
But even the semblance of rationality is dying at this point.

can't wait to slaughter all rationalfags, lol
that day is coming!

>>9925608
Perhaps my comment was wrong, because more and more irrational doesn't necessarily imply that it was rational at any point - just relatively more.
But what does rational and irrational mean to you? If it is religion, there are still countries - namely in Europe - that are becoming less religious. If you follow the psychological concept of rationality then there is no reason to think rationality was ever there. If rational has to do with New Atheist/LessWrong types, well, I am not sure if they are decreasing. Peterson is hugely popular; though I have no idea what the demographics are. And I'm not sure if his thought can be considered irrational, perhaps it is just another kind of 'rationality'.

>>9925581
I don't know much about Peterson....what does he have to do with mysticism?

Indians are far enough from whiteness that their reactionary statements don't give goose-white people like you hives, but this is just "golden prehistory" sentiment.

It's true, but it's not wise to speak of such things:

Ecclesiastes 7:10

***

Also, things were much more irrational in the 60s than they are now. World is connected by a computer network of pure reason today. wtf

>>9925608
Didn't know Ken M posted on /lit/.

>>9925608
take it from an autistic Jew, OP: the kids are alright

slatestarcodex.com/2013/10/20/the-anti-reactionary-faq/