Is this book as enlightening as people say it is or is it just

Define postmodern
Define drivel
And DEFINITELY define enlightening

>>9905517
It's composed primarily of fifty cent words, once you get padt that it's the most asinine collection of philo-bullshitting since Heidegger.

>>9905517
I'm reading it now and I'm thoroughly loving it. Fills in a bunch of gaps left from a 2 year Heidegger spree and his products. If you're some Jp anti-postmodern who elevates his attitudes and opinions as Troof than this will suck.

I'm a little depressed about having to make that aside

>>9905530
You should read Aztec Philosophy by Maffie, they did Heidegger better than himself

>>9905538
You seem ignore the historical place Heidegger serves. I'm a young boy looking at people react to the west.

Instead of reading Deleuze etc I should just go read the Upanishads because India got process better than Deleuze did. That is only half sarcasm

>>9905552
It shouldn't even be half sarcasm. That's distinctly true.
Historicity means shit if a subject was already well established but ignored due to eurocentric hubris.
It's like someone ignoring niggers having invented the wheel and then celebrating the milestone of the first White Wheel which is sadly square