Has anyone here read this? I am judging a book by it's

>>9903807
>some of the people on Goodreads said it's really not good
That's a good sign you should read it.

>>9903807
>For fans of John Dies at the End
Fucking sold! Thanks op

unironically ask reddit. i mean this as an insult and display of my erudition of course, but /r/ books is also more likely to give you a helpful response than /lit/ which reads almost exclusively canon works ie not contemporary

that cover is dope desu

>>9903807
>goodreads

Stop right there.

>>9903911
Negative/neutral Goodreads reviews can be useful for the criticisms leveled. (Of course, negative reviews on classics are potato.)