Does anyone have any book recommendations that personally improved

>>9893023
Culture of Critique Series by Kevin MacDonald

>>9893029
>Culture of Critique Series
tremendous contribution, thank you

alberto eco's the dante code

increased my puzzle solving skills for book murders in my monastery

>>9893023
His whole metaphysical foundations are wrong and that leaves his account of human nature and his ethical doctrines floating in the air

Anyone who is a Spinozist while rejecting Hegel should be thrown in a labor camp.

>>9893415
How can you even tell they're wrong? Geometry doesn't work the way he wants it to, his arguments aren't structured in anything resembling valid forms. It's impossible to say whether his definitions work or not because he's so specific about the function of each term in his system, and he's very eager to dismiss everyone who's ever disagreed with him as an idiot. His conception of God has nothing meaningful in common with the traditional Christian or Jewish conceptions of deity. There is no good reason to take anything in the Ethics seriously. Maybe the Tractatus Philosophico-Politicus is better. I don't care if it is--the Ethics is the big metaphysical dog, and it's all bark and no bite.