I´ve read through Kierkegaard when i was 17 and want to start

also general kierkegaard-thread

Honestly, I think you should give a try to Kierkegaard's works, as his style is not as unnecessary complicated as Heidegger, for example. Even though it can be hard sometimes, I can not belive that someone could explain you better what he intended. The struggle is not to understand the language, but to analyze the situation he gives you, to compare it to reality, as the main interest of his philosophy is the human being.

>>9887772
as i said i read through his main works when i was younger, i also read some pages of Either/Or again, so iam very familiar with his works, but i want to dig deeper in various interpretations of hid works like the Adonro one.

this seems like something that could be interesting to you: http://www.angelfire.com/nb/shestov/sk/sk_0.html

Imo with someone like SK, it would more productive for you to think about some specific themes in his writing and then look into secondary lit about those. For exemple, if your interested in his views on ethics, you could look into Alastair Macintyre's writings on the subject, and so on.

>>9887891
>http://www.angelfire.com/nb/shestov/sk/sk_0.html
thank you :)