Who is the Anthony Fantano of literature? And why are all reviewers

>>9886738
Someone that doesn't know much about literature. Pick a random Youtuber.

>>9886738
Jordan Peterson.

File: 1500342676478.jpg (54KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x640px

>>9886776

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-13 at 9.59.26 pm.png (77KB, 586x219px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 586x219px

/Cliff/

>>9886829
shadilay my kekistani brothers!

File: IMG_7821.jpg (24KB, 371x409px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 371x409px

/Cliff/

File: image.jpg (19KB, 253x253px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 253x253px

>>9886856
>that quote

>>9886738
>why is their no Youtube celebrity telling /lit/ what opinion to have on books they haven't even read

We should be grateful if anything.

File: IMG_8936.jpg (70KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1136x640px

Photoshop this

>>9886990
Thank you. This is exactly what I'm looking for.

>>9887037
Or introduces you to new things. Of course you wouldn't appreciate that.

>>9886738
Your second sentence describes Fantano perfectly (without the qts part)

>>9887050
>This is exactly what I'm looking for.
You're looking for an insufferable pretentious faggot who barely talks about the books he "reviews"?

>Or introduces you to new things.
The history of literature is so well documented and systematized that you'd have to be an idiot to need a youtuber to find more books.

>>9887026
It's Epictetus originally, I think. The place is within us or some shit. obviously lol.

>>9887148
Have fun not having fun you luddite.

>>9887180
How am I a luddite? Do you even know what a luddite is? And how am I "not having fun"? Is fun found only in retarded youtube videos?

>>9886738
Who is the Samuel Andreyev of literature?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw_fWpymCDg