What's the /lit/ opinion on revisions? Do they potentially

i really don't fucking care

>>9854457
Be careful not to cut yourself on all that edge.

I've never read King, never will. What kind of revisions are you talking about? Is King pulling a Rowling and actively seeking to change the main character's ethnicity for the movie? If so, then it shouldn't surprising to you. King just writes detailed movie scripts.

>>9854495
He's adding an underage gangbang to every chapter

>>9854506
Welp, time to start reading King, I suppose.

>>9854515
Unironically this

>>9854495
He did the revisions decades ago and it wasn't anything major. He just made some changes to the first book so it fit into the later novels more easily.

It annoys me but that's the autism talking

>>9854453
It had to be done to fit into the saga as it evolved. But the first book is better as a surreal, poetic sort of dream journey than as the first installment of a story with a very different tone.

>>9854506
What

we don't need anymore HONK MAHFAHs starring leading roles