did Rowling really write this shit? I keep hearing that she didn't,

>>9849845
I remember seeing an interesting post a few months ago about how her publisher was associated with MI5, and that publishing company published a book that was extremely similar to Harry Potter. If anyone can confirm/disprove this then I'd appreciate it.

there's one main reason to believe that she did write it: her online personality matches the warped understanding of the world presented in the books. The Harry Potter series is exactly the kind of books a person like JK Rowling would write.

>>9849917
how do you even know that its her thats tweeting?

>>9849929
>The Iliad may not have been written by Homer, but rather by someone of the same name

Nah, it was a black lady. Same one as Shakespeare.

>>9849904
yeah but for what purpose is there to cover up this

>>9849845
You people dont know how the publishing industry works do you. Sure, she wrote some vague draft, but then editors and ghosts transformed it into what it was. Just how it works. Women writers especially need a fuck ton of hand holding. Maybe only 20 % of that was hers.

Also it is confirmed by just how awful her non harry potter follow-ups were.

>>9850750
>Women writers especially need a fuck ton of hand holding

You think most women writers don't contribute the majority of what is published in their name? On what basis can you claim this?

>>9850882
quiet roastie

>>9850882
Women are generally all the same person, so the roles are interchangeable when the team comes together

>>9849845

This would imply that the books are somehow beyond an ordinary human's ability to make. While reading them, it's painfully evident that indeed very ordinary human ability was what produced them.