What are the worst political science books in /lit/'s

>>9824536
expand.

worst because you disagree with it? why?
worst because you dislike the writing style?

this is why the quality of threads on /lit/ are poor and, consequently, only shit-posters remain here....creating more bad threads

>>9824536
It's a great book and there are few other redpilled books like it on the subject of the media, let alone by leftists whatsoever.

Not OP and I don't think it's the worst, but the times I have read Chomsky I found his style to be excruciatingly dry. It's like the academy drilled him in some rigid writing process and he can't undo their programming.

The impression that I get from it is something like... Point -> "And this is why I am right." -> "And this is why I am right." -> "And this is why I am right." -> "And this is why I am right." -> "And this is why I am right." -> "And this is why I am right." -> "And this is why I am right." -> "And this is why I am right." -> ...

And by the time he is finished hammering that one point, which I was ready to provisionally accept some lines back, I am irritated rather than eager to find out where he is going to take it next. Because all I have to look forward to is more "And this is why I am right."