Okay /lit/, so I have a problem. I used to read while subvocalizing.

>>9815735
Well everyone reads differently, apparently, but I sub-vocalize while taking notes, highlighting, and tagging pages of significant shit. Needless to say, sometimes it takes my quite a significant amount of time to read some books. But, I spend a significant about of time in study, which makes it. possible, more worth my time. I don't think I'd get away with reading fast and being able to reach my interpretation on some novels. Do what you think is best for you. I think it's best to spend your time understanding what you are looking at.

>>9815905
Whoa! My apologies for the grammar errors.
>Smokes weed and shit posts on 4chan for fun on a weekend.
>Really living it up

>>9815914
The worst part is I have really shit retention no matter what, so I can't really tell whether or not I understand what I read even if I didn't subvocalize. The frustration comes in with unnecessary reading. I'm more than willing to read a normal pace if it means better comprehension, but I can't figure out how. It's either sluggishly re-reading and get absolutely everything or speeding and may or may not understand everything.

>>9815938
Yeah, the absolutely everything way is the way to go. Detail upon detail, books are really great if you let them be.

I subvocalize my death.

FUCK /LIT/ HOW DO I DO IT I FEEL LIKE IM GOING INSANE

I TRY READING NORMALLY AND END UP READING THE SAME FUCKING SENTENCE OVER AND OVER TO MAKE SURE I GOT IT ALL

AND WHENEVER I TRY NOT REREAD SENTENCES I JUST END UP SPEEDREADING AND NOT SUBVOCALIZING

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

WHAT THE FUCK DO I DO IM GONNA LOSE IT

I KEEP ON TRYING TO READ BUT I ALWAYS GET STUCK ON SOME WACKY DETAIL AND REREAD THE SAME FUCKING SENTENCE OVER AND OVER AGAIN BECAUSE IM NEVER SURE WHETHER I GOT IT ALL

>>9816053
Try not being a brainlet. If this fails, then get some Adderall.

>>9816070
I'm not a brainlet I swear

Doesn't adderall fuck up your mind?

one last bump