Hi /lit/. I've been wanting to start getting into classic American novels, and I've been particularly interested in The Red Badge of Courage and Moby Dick. I read the kid versions of those books years ago, and I remember liking them, so I want to read the "real" versions of those stories now. I've always heard that they're pretty slow and heavy though, so what tips do you have for someone who is new to reading older literature to be able to get through the novel without feeling like I'm just reading on autopilot to get the story done?
>>9806398
red badge is poor fabulation. moby-dick is good taste.
>>9806437
I've never seen such a shit opinion in my life. Never post here again.
>>9806493
But hardly anybody on Goodreads likes it.
>>9806493
Look here, Sir, I will post where I like.
Red Badge is warm garbage. A story for boys who want to be soldiers, and not true to life at all. It is Homer without the ancient pedigree or skill.
>>9806605
This is not true at all. Like I said, never post here again.
>>9806605
It's a lovely, impressionistic masterpiece.
>>9806398
Call of the Wild and White Fang are my favorites.
A collected works of Poe (including poetry)
Moby Dick is great but not entry level.
Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn are very fun but not as /lit/ as others.
Lonesome Dove, Lolita, Gone with the Wind and Blood Meridian for 20th century imo
>>9807579
How are you able to fully understand the older English? I've tried reading some older American literature in high school, and that was a huge problem for me and keeping me engaged. It's been awhile since then, so it may not be a problem now, but that's why I'm mainly worried about. And when you say Moby Dick isn't entry level, what do you mean?
>>9806398
Post more Sarah Gadon