What's the canon reason for why Frankenstein is stitched

Frankenstein takes the best parts from the corpses to form the ideal man.

>>9802574
Except he didn't. Unless the monster was just supposed to be a slave that did manual labor.

>>9802556
You mean Lord Byron, not Mary Shelly.

>>9802864
>tfw you know Byron cucked Percy and he deserved it for padding his genius wife's powerful novel.

>>9802611
>Except he didn't.

Congratulations, Anon, you figured out the point of the novel.

>>9802556
He isn't stitched together in the book actually. That was an invention of the movies.

>>9802906
The book is extraordinarily vague about everything concerning the monster's creation. I do believe, though, that it's alluded that Victor procured parts from multiple corpses. The "stitching together" is just a clearer representation of that for film.

>>9802556
>Frankenstein is stitched together from multiple body parts?
he isn't? he's just a regular dude who was a bit of a mentalist

File: 1497854849509.jpg (69KB, 425x405px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 425x405px

*Frankenstein's Monster

>>9802556
It's a metaphor for being a woman.
They put alot of dysphoria into their appearance, and if your boobs are too small or something it's like being stitched together with random body parts.

>>9802926
>>9802920
Look how funny and original these guys are everybody! No one has ever made these jokes in a Frankenstein thread before.

>>9802943
>Frankenstein
's Monster

>>9802574
>>9802914
These guys get it

>>9802611
>>9802906
These guys are idiots.

>>9802864
Mary loved Percy gtfo