Can /lit/ actually intelligently refute anything he has said?
or is the hate for him unfounded and driven by autism?
Acts17Apologetics.
>>9763602
What? I'll take that as a no
>>9763599
I think most of the ire directed at him comes from The Moral Landscape, which philosophers despise.
He isn't completely wrong he is just a massive pleb. being really into Harris just shows you are a teenager and haven't progressed to more difficult thinkers.
Basically fuck off OP you pretentious retard.
His opinions are pedestrian as fuck. Don't know how you can call him a philosopher when he would agree with everything a typical redditor would believe.
>>9763674
>the quality of a thinker depends entirely on the novelty of his opinions, rather than the clear articulation of them