>Although appearing left wing my training is really Fascistic—not

>>9760854
It's honestly a pretty nuanced and explosive view, I doubt even /pol/-tards would totally agree with it, because it also has the postmodern/mystical aspect to it they so hate (Reality is completely subjective). But then again, /pol/ isn't really a coherent group.

No. And fascism cannot operate on subjective idealism.

>Like all sound political conceptions, Fascism is action and it is thought; action in which doctrine is immanent, and doctrine arising from a given system of historical forces in which it is inserted, and working on them from within (1). It has therefore a form correlated to contingencies of time and space; but it has also an ideal content which makes it an expression of truth in the higher region of the history of thought (2). There is no way of exercising a spiritual influence in the world as a human will dominating the will of others, unless one has a conception both of the transient and the specific reality on which that action is to be exercised, and of the permanent and universal reality in which the transient dwells and has its being. To know men one must know man; and to know man one must be acquainted with reality and its laws. There can be no conception of the State which is not fundamentally a conception of life: philosophy or intuition, system of ideas evolving within the framework of logic or concentrated in a vision or a faith, but always, at least potentially, an organic conception of the world.

>(2) Today I hold that Fascism as an idea, a doctrine, a realization, is universal; it is Italian in its particular institutions, but it is universal in the spirit, nor could it be otherwise. The spirit is universal by reason of its nature. Therefore anyone may foresee a Fascist Europe. Drawing inspiration for her institutions from the doctrine and practice of Fascism; Europe , in other words, giving a Fascist turn to the solution of problems which beset the modern State, the Twentieth Century State which is very different from the States existing before 1789, and the States formed immediately after. Today Fascism fills universal requirements; Fascism solves the threefold problem of relations between State and individual, between State and associations, between associations and organized associations. (Message for the year 1 October 27, 1930, in Discorsi del 1930, Milano, Alpes, 1931, p. 211).
http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm

Where does the notion that fascism is based on the repudiation of objective reality come from? The mistaken but sadly common identification of fascism with the philosophy of Nietzsche?

>>9760854
>Is Philip K. Dick /ourguy/?
Go back to /poz/!

>>9760957
I'm already here.

>>9760854
>Thus my real idol is Hitler
That's awfully problematic. I guess I don't like Blade Runner anymore.

>>9760854
post modernists are a plague

>>9763586

> ad hominem

Look it up. You disprove nothing by calling a statement you don't like post-modern.

Over the past while I have concerned myself with Pound, Mosley, Codreanu, Cioran, & Gentile, as well as secondary literature.

When can one consider oneself a Fascist?

File: 1300044776986.jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

>>9760854
>Hitler scorned plutocracy

>>9763614
A. Force castor oil down the throat, a truncheon up the asshole, and a boot on the neck of a liberal.
B. Start over from A.

It sounds retarded, like every political philosophy which doesn't have firm economic foundations.
All of this fancy ontology curiously falls apart when you become another neoliberal cuck.

>>9763586
>Fascists
>Postmodern

>>9763649
>We make truth; what we (first) believe becomes objectively true. Objective truth depends on what we believe, not the other way around
>not post modern garbage

>>9763619
look at all the scorned jewish plutocrats

>>9763687
>>Although appearing left wing my training is really Fascistic—not ”Fascistic” as Marxist rhetoric defines it but as Mussolini defined it
>Not fascist