What is the draw to the claim that we can't know things in of themselves when we can directly reproduce things synthetically?
>>9747106
Read Kant
>>9747125
Kant dodges the issue, just like PoMos did. Cognitive skepticism loses its appeal in in light of the functioning of bridges and synthetic insulin etc.
>>9747132
Because...?
>>9747132
Put simply, I think their idealism becomes pure eschatology, as a kind of rhetorical refuge, to deal with the objective failure of anti-enlightenment epistemology and its predictions.
It would be helpful if someone could actually answer the OP, rather than dodge it.