>create yourself
>but love fate also
>create your own values as the ubermensch
>but you're just a bunch of psychological drives and your consciousness is passive epiphenomenon
>people who want free will just want to perpetuate slave morality
>people who deny free will just don't want to take responsibility things
what did he mean by this? what does he propose we do? is it systematic or a whole lot of contradictions, in which case is it intended to reflect some aspect of the human condition? wtf is the consensus on his position on self-creation/amor fati? free will and responsibility? every time i read one scholar's interpretation there are a bunch more arguing against it.
He was just proving philosophy useless
T.never read him
>>9741083
human experience duality
nietzsche is a human
therefore nietzsche experiences duality
>>9741083
the ultimate aim of philosophy is reconciliation.
a good philosophy reconciles all things into mutual paradox, imitating the universe. life and death, polarity as we know it. nothing exists without its obverse other, creating an inverse, which in turn has it's own opposition.
Nietzsche had an excellent philosophical mind, meaning he could synthesize things into a unified whole.
who is to say our fate isn't to create ourselves? who is to say most people's free will isn't used to willingly disavow it as much as possible?
"I am that which must constantly overcome itself."
>>9741083
Paradox exists in the weak alone. A strong type does not systematize and understands perspective deeply, in everything that is observed.
>>9741570
>the strong type ignores intellectual rigour for a poetic philosophy that makes him feel good about himself
lol ok
>>9741635
t. analytic cuck
1 learn sailing into the wind
2 you're goint to be unjust, even if you pretend to be neutral.
3 free will is an illusion to promote spooks like selfless action. people who pretend to be selfless are denying the reality of their indestructable will to power, which is not the same as free will.
>>9741635
>the strong type invents a universal discursive system and causes catastrophes after uniting autonomous domains of human experience.
shiggy
>>9742371
Is there a better philosophy?
>>9741083
He knew he was contradicting himself a lot, well perhaps not all the time. Some of it is just laying out many different perspectives, some of it is because his thought developed and changed over time, some of it is probably him just fucking with you and some of it is just carelessness.
>>9741083
>hated Socrates and Martin Luther
>was just as bad
>edgy teens love him