Business idea: why don't we give each other five-star amazon

>>9718942
will make sure to post a one-star review once you link yours. "not your private army" etc

>>9718944
>"not your private army" etc
thank you reddit

>>9718942
>why don't we give each other five-star amazon reviews on the crap we have written?
Because Amazon bans that shit, that's why.

>>9718942
See, >>9718944 this is why it won't work, too many underage /b/ migrants who'll just fuck with it out of spite. Public forums aren't good for this sort of thing.

File: affa.jpg (88KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1024x768px

>>9718942
>why don't we give each other five-star amazon reviews on the crap we have written?

because that would require me to read your crap, and that's not happening any time soon.

similarly, i don't expect anyone to wade through MY crap and try to decode every single William S Burroughs allusion. nobody got time fo' dat shit.

>>9718942
Why should I do a favor to an anonymous asshole with whom I may have fought two minutes ago?

Fuck you, crap must remain crap

>>9720734
>similarly, i don't expect anyone to wade through MY crap and try to decode every single William S Burroughs allusion. nobody got time fo' dat shit.
this thread's repugnant but i'mma gonna have to track you down without further clues now. you've no idea how much time i've got for larping a burrough's novel. (dick too)

>>9718942
because that would be intellectually dishonest and i wouldn't be able to live with myself if I did that.

>>9720763
>this thread's repugnant
you are repugnant

>>9720801
well you could hardly expect anything else from a burroughs fan but this thread's still morally repugnant to even people who read about rape drugs mind control and evisceration.