Would you read this? I think of all right-wing "skeptics"

>>9716872
Sargon is a cuck who refers to himself as a liberal. He's kosher right, for now. We'll see how much he progresses in the future.

>>9716891
I'd maybe consider him a good introduction to show to normies that you wouldn't want to scare away with some of the more straightforward stuff.

>>9716900
I'd agree with that. Those people are necessary. The problem lies with them becoming controlled kosher opposition.

>>9716922
go back to /pol/

i fucking hate this guy.
He's very pathetic and is clearly one of those "i've been a loser/underdog for 35 years so i must be right"-types

>>9716929
EVERYONE I DISAGREE WITH IS FROM /POL/
Go back to redddit.

>>9716872
He's fat and beats his kid

>>9716942
Source? Not on him being fat lmoa

>>9716900
>>9716891
>>9716922
neat, nazis on /lit/

>>9716957
"Notsee" isn't a real word, kid. You've been Kabbalistically conditioned.

>>9716872
>lit turned into v with their eceleb shit
wew

File: willy-wonka-it-must-be-convenient-everyone-you-disagree-with-being-nazi-bigot-homophobes.jpg (42KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x500px

>>9716957
Here have a (((You)))

now we just need more peturdson shitposting

>>9716872
Why would anyone ever waste his time to read a pretentious pseudo-intellectual?
There are so many good books on politics that one could read instead of following this charlatan.

>>9716937
Dude you are from /pol/ don't even try this shit we're not on /v/ litgate will never happen

>>9716872
Being against SJW's doesn't make you right wing. He's made videos criticizing right wing economics, being for minimum wage and welfare.

>>9716937
*Correction*
EVERYONE THAT CLEARLY EXPRESSES ALT-RIGHT OPINIONS IS FROM /POL/

Why read a pseud like sargon when you could be reading actual contemporary (right winged) thinkers like Scruton, Finkielkraut, Bloom...

>>9716957
nice, a redditor on /lit/

>>9717841
but /pol/ hates alt-reich.

>>9716957
>/lit/
>being illiterate
why are you here?

>>9717623
This desu. I listened to him on Rogan and he was a joke. When Joe Rogan starts pointing out flaws in your intellectual and moral outlook you have a problem.

>>9716872
I used to follow Sargon but the more videos of his I watch the less I seem to agree with him nowadays. I don't believe he's particularly "liberal" despite myself and his views agreeing when it comes to SJW double standards. If he was liberal, I doubt he would have been so open to supporting Brexit and Theresa May, and, in-effect, also supporting the lack of funding to the UK's national health service and emergency services. I think Sargon's an intelligent-enough person and he seems to be intentionally provocative and antagonistic almost for kicks (like Milo really), but sometimes I can't help but disagree with what he stands for. Probably an OK guy to get a coffee with though.