>"The only thing which consoles us for our miseries is diversion, and yet this is the greatest of our miseries. For it is this which principally hinders us from reflecting upon ourselves, and which makes us insensibly ruin ourselves. Without this we should be in a state of weariness and this weariness would spur us to seek a more solid means of escaping from it. But diversion amuses us, and leads us unconsciously to death."
Is reading for escapism wrong?
>>9700313
Yep. But we're all escapists anyways.
>>9700313
>more solid escapism
like death perhaps?
look, pascal, according to you, both ways lead to death, one conscious and one unconscious. searching for bullshit paradoxes in the human condition is obviously your diversion, but it sure as fuck wearies me.
>>9701502
t. ernest becker
Any recommendations for an english edition of the pensees? Can I just pick up a Penguin or what?
>>9702527
nothing wrong with f.w. trotter
https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/p/pascal/blaise/p27pe/complete.html
pascal was influenced by some dutch protestant fanatics who regarded every outward activity including science as diversion, that's also why he stopped doing math or physics to concentrate completely on his magnum opus.
>>9700313
I'm reading through pensees right now, and from what I understood his proclamation of things being diversions isn't an attack, he's just implying how scientists who claim how the nobles and kings who occupy themselves with hunting or games are retarded are basically doing the same thing. How the need for diversions is a human universal, since an unoccupied mind is a troubled mind.