Which works of poetry or fiction would be included in the

>>9680690
Western canon is by definition traditional as is Chinese canon or any other canon.

idk but whatever the opposite of eye cancer is it's that painting

>>9680690
Traditionalists don't have a canon they just scavenge and appropriate the works of others. Traditionalism is a product of modernism and can be called properly post-modern

What school of traditionalism? And If I remember correctly most poets were borderline reactionary politically, so I don't think a "traditionalist canon" would be much different than a normal canon.

>>9680694
But the 'Western canon' includes degenerate works like the Satyricon, which would not be appropriate for traditionalism.

>>9680729
Your confusing Christian Conservatism and Traditionalism Anon, Evola himself was degenerate as fuck.

>>9680729
So "traditionalism" is just Puritanism? You guys should just ban reading.

Plebes not able to discern between degeneracy and decadent aesthetics
Kys in an entertaining way please.

>>9680746
>not dying in a aesthetic way

>>9680748
Did you know Baudelaire spent a year paralyzed before he died of poison (suspected that he paid his servant to administer it)

>>9680729
You're confusing different ideas.