Why haven't you read the collected works of the 2017 Nobel

>>9671670
Sorry I don't read that much haha

>>9671670

Because the Nobel prize is a sham insofar as it relates to things which are not hard sciences.

I once read The Dwarf by Lagerkvist while in high school. SUCKED. BORING. HATED IT. Another literature laureate: Bob Dylan.

Peace laureates include Henry Kissinger, Arafat, Israeli prime ministers, and Obama for no other reason than that Europe wanted to celebrate that Bush was gone and oh maybe you Americans aren't completely stupid after all (this was before Obama had actually done anything while in office).

Even if we take literary laureates' work on their own merits, a central condition of a laureates' work is that it should be humane, humanist, uplifting. In other words, it is obliged to be dishonest.

The Nobel Prize is a sham.

>>9671670
but i have

File: 1440698006802[1].jpg (264KB, 1000x1481px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1000x1481px

Because Willam Vollmann is really prolific. its very time consuming to read his entire body of work.

Of course I have read my own works

Because I haven't finished my first work yet