I still don't understand whether this faggot was a Marxist critic hating on postmodernism or if he was actually a Postmodernist explaining postmodernism and in various account I have read he is sometimes depicted as the former and somtimes depicted as the latter.
Is this a typical case of misinterpretation caused by obscurantist language (e.g. people simply can't agree what Jameson is on about cause they don't really grasp what the fuck he is saying) or did he change his position at some point?
Case in point: his main work Postmodernism or the Logical of Late Capitalism I have seen variously described as the major critique of postmodernism and one of its major works.
I don't get it.
>>9666174
He's a Marxist. He doesn't "hate" postmodernism, he just historicizes it.