What voice do you hear when you read? Does it depend on

A darker voice of my own

>>9648086
>subvocalizing

>>9648086

Paulie's voice from The Sopranos, when something shocking happens it internally goes "oooooh"

>>9648135
you have valuable headspace.
>>9648086
Some authors do dialects really well. Even though it's only the syntax not the spelling that changes in Waugh's Decline and Fall it's the best Welsh accent I've read. I can't read it without it sounding Welsh. The same thing happens with Trainspotting where, until you get the dialect, entire chapters make no sense. Or trying to read Wodehouse in a less posh accent just doesn't work; there's no way to read "Sorry, old egg" without a plummy public school voice.

None.

>>9648109
>>9648264
Not subvocalizing is impossible you fucking tryhard retards.

>>9648285
Wrong, brainlet.

>>9648285
I don't subvocalize at all and if I started it would probably feel like blinking intentionally.

>>9648086
My brain tends to put William S Burroughs and Ken Nordine as narrating everything.

>>9648295
>>9648304
Wrong, retards. You may perceive yourself as not subvocalizing, but no matter what you are always at least subvocalize a little bit. That's just Science.

>>9648285
What? No its not, it's faster to read without a voice

Cate Blanchett reads all of my books.

>>9648375
>le epic speedreading meme

Why are pseudo-intellectual tryhards so gullible?

>>9648086

Hear a voice? I read thoughts which are then translated into my own. There is no audible sound. There is no voice to be heard.

>>9648285
>>9648370
that's great, I can't "hear" anything though, since nobody is saying anything

>>9648370
No I don't. I don't even have sound in my dreams. I might just be neurologically damaged though. Anyway I'm sure the deaf don't.

>>9648380
patrician choice

>>9648435
>I might just be neurologically damaged though
That is guaranteed just by you being on 4chan.