Is there any interpretation of The Sound and the Fury which views

God, I hope not.

>>9637791

what a stupid, reductive reading. all you've done is reify the trope of narrative

>>9638050
It's just one interpretation I thought of. I didn't say it's the best interpretation, or that I would even agree with it, it's just something I was curious about.

If you read my post, you would recognize all of this, you illiterate dolt. Go shitpost about Jordan Peterson if you aren't going to contribute here.

>>9637791
No, and
>a dream in the Freudian definition, considering that Freud, in The Interpretation of Dreams, states that a dream presents things very unclearly in the beginning and by the end of a dream the representations become clear
that's a stupid way to define a dream

>>9638782
To be fair, it's not the only defining feature of a dream mentioned. Just thought of it. I had never heard of that kind of interpretation, and didn't expect to find one, but I just wanted to check.

Usually when I make threads just asking a question, I get pretty decent answers. Every now and then I get >>9638050
"Reify the trope of narrative" oh please.

Anyway, thanks for the answer.