>"hey anon you read a lot of history, you should read this"
almost all of his information is outdated and wrong, his discussion of egypt in particular is laughably off the mark. his commentary on china is probably the only thing close to accurate.
>"hey anon you read a lot of history, you should read this"
Nobody has ever said this with reference to Hegel. Please stop making threads in response to imaginary scenarios whose absurdities, which you're trying to scorn, have never existed.
>>9625529
treat yourself
>>9625550
well someone did, and that someone directed it at me
maybe you should stop being an autistic reactionary before you post.