>essay due >hurrrr Wikipedia is not a valid source

>>9610764
Just quote the article's sources

dumb frogposter

You should be writing at a higher level than what Wikipedia can give you

>>9610764
Wikipedia is not a source of original content you dumb frogposter.
All it does is collate other sources.

Imagine if your friend told you something and where he learnt it. You couldn't just cite your friend. The same goes for Wikipedia.
>>9611157
What did he mean by this?

File: 1385930021085.jpg (19KB, 250x315px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 250x315px

>use the sources given by wikipedia
>I didn't read a single one of them and only put them in to validate my rhetoric

It teaches you to use the sources Wikipedia itself refers to you dunce. It's NEVER good practice to quote wiki itself and I wouldn't take somebody seriously that did.

the internet is not all fun and games anon.

>>9610764
Wikipedia (1 is a perfectly valid source (2 (3 (4 (5 (6 ( 7 (8 (9, although some claim that it isn't (10? needs verification

File: tljones.jpg (21KB, 450x299px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 450x299px

Are you fucking retarded