/script>
Your most /lit/ lit. critics?
Also
>Who is missing from this 3x3 as the most /lit/ of all time?
inb4 Neatcheese, Fou-I fuck kids-cault, or Judith Butler (nothing clever here, she's just a flaming lesbian)
>>9605434
Put Boccaccio in the white famalamadingdong.
>>9605434
EMPSON
M
P
S
O
N
>>9605434
Frye
>>9605434
Criticism is just what you do when you can neither write fiction or philosophy
>implying lesbianism isn't the most /lit/ sexuality
The Schlegels, Sainte-Beuve, George Steiner, Erich Auerbach, Harold Goddard, Helen Vendler, etc.
>>9605463
>people think this
>people enjoy woody allen movies
go back
>>9605586
Found the critic
>>9605434
The answer is
>Samuel Taylor Coleridge
by the way
>>9605455
He's already in there desu
>>9605579
You made me wet with accuracy.
>>9605620
I also supplied the STC, doll--
which BETTER be correct....
Johnson, Bloom, Wilson, Hazlitt.
Arnold and Eliot are awful imo, especially eliot
>>9605870
Unfair to Johnson, but the rest are moot. On the other hand consider the parameters: /lit/.
>>9605870
Wait. Perhaps I misread /you/...
>>9605434
>Judith Butler
Why did Butler write Gender Trouble in such an obscuring fashion? Literally, her writing style hinders her ability to communicate her ideas clearly, which actually hold a lot of merit.
>>9605941
Sokol Affair my duded B)
>>9605870
>shits on Arnold
>praises Bloom
neck yourself
>>9605579
Yeah most of these are classics
>>9605870
You're just repeating what Bloom say
>>9605941
All of her ideas are either trivial or stupid
>>9605434
who da missing critic? Auden? Coleridge? Cool Bill Empson? My mang Isaac Disraeli?
>The defects of great men are the consolation of the dunces. ID
The Amenities of Literature, The Curiosities of Literature: totes the shit.
Virginia Woolfe
>>9606752
Because he too dislikes Eliot's criticism? Eliot just has shit taste, some of his favorites are utter nonentities
>>9606446
At least bloom has had some original thoughts. Arnold's criticism never goes below the surface
>>9605463